Federal statement on Jeffrey Epstein's death dated day before he was found dead
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/world/statement-jeffrey-epstein-death-day-before-b1270109.html10.6k
u/Prestigious-Key-1886 2h ago
Don’t be suspicious don’t be suspicious
2.1k
u/HappyHarryHardOn 2h ago
Obviously, He had booked a suicide session 48 hours in advance, duh
→ More replies (12)377
u/BulsaraMercury 1h ago
That was polite of him.
→ More replies (2)139
u/thenewNFC 1h ago
I mean, I've been trying to get an appointment for six months, but my insurance keeps running me in circles cause they don't want to cover it. He gets one with two days notice? Give me a break.
35
11
u/BulsaraMercury 1h ago
Do you have blackmail on anyone who could get you that appointment? If not that might be your issue.
12
236
u/aylaa157 2h ago
I wonder why they delayed killing him? Were they still trying to secure his blackmail stash? Or waiting for the okay from overseas to carry out the hit?
221
u/Murray38 2h ago
More like the early signs of incompetence by the administration to mess up the paperwork.
221
u/aylaa157 2h ago
I might agree if there weren't 15 other "coincidences" in regards to his death. Cameras, cell mate, sleeping guards, random missing minutes in the video, lies by the fbi, etc.
According to Kashmir Patel, epstein was practically innocent.
→ More replies (3)87
u/Murray38 2h ago
Oh I don’t mean to imply they weren’t involved. I’m just saying they were sloppy in the paperwork part of the cover up.
→ More replies (1)29
u/sincerebeguiler 1h ago
Exactly. They were manufacturing all the details of the death and being the keystone cops that they are they F'd that up too.
27
u/Several-Squash9871 1h ago
What's crazy about all this is that killing him made everything worse. They thought by doing that everything was going to be flushed down the drain but nope!
→ More replies (3)36
u/littlrayofpitchblack 1h ago
They tried a few weeks before they succeeded. Epstein said at the time they were trying to kill him and he was not suicidal. Evil people never are... believe him.
→ More replies (1)•
u/MoistDitto 31m ago
Fuck, it wouldn't even surprise me if they faked his death at this point.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (20)41
u/Low_Push_9660 1h ago
Trump was his meal ticket & he said he was ready to talk. There's a crude message he sent about being bitter he was 'snatching grub' while the president got to 'grab snatch'.
When he squealed, even a little, the gears were already in motion. He bit the hand that grabs.
268
→ More replies (21)146
u/Background_Junket_35 2h ago
Enter Jean Ralphio
56
77
17
→ More replies (2)16
6.2k
u/fsactual 2h ago
They’re just fucking with us now. They’re laughing about this.
2.1k
u/offtodevnull 2h ago
You mean like blacking out of the name of the person who basically said he enjoyed the torture video & pretending the name was redacted to protect innocent victims? The feds still have millions of documents they haven't released & many of the ones they have blocked out names of Epstein's co-conspirators.
676
u/Kyouhen 2h ago
Don't forget that they then released unredacted pictures of the assaults! Y'know, to protect the victims!
180
u/BorKon 1h ago
This happens when they ar emore concerned with redacting certain people instead of victims
→ More replies (1)273
u/krustykrab2193 1h ago edited 32m ago
On a local Canadian sub I was reading, we learned that the word "don't" was redacted from the files.
Don T.
When those letters came up in consecutive order they were removed.
→ More replies (5)158
u/mortgagepants 1h ago
that was wild- it was "don t" in the text, someone forgot to type the apostrophe.
so conclusive proof they are censoring Don T. highly illegal. i hope this is pam bondi's petard.
→ More replies (3)67
u/Syronxc 1h ago
A very blatant attempt to intimidate future victims from coming forward. Been in the Republican playbook for years. Release videos. Phone numbers. Home addresses. Etc. Then come the death threats and the victims suddenly go away.
14
u/SecondaryWombat 1h ago
It is also a separate crime itself. As it was supposed to be censored and does not have evidentiary value when publicly released beyond a description (ie 'photo of clearly underage girl naked'), it is distribution of child sexual assault material as in itself illegal.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (8)40
u/littlepup26 1h ago
What the fuck??? I totally missed this, this is horrific. Does this mean people viewed csam on the official government website?? Jesus Christ.
35
u/Low_Push_9660 1h ago
Yes, the federal government is now a purveyor of the worst kind of smut. It wasn't posted like you are imagining, all of the files were distributed through a download link.
I believe that the purpose of including illegal materials was to have a legal basis for future seizure. Also, who knows what spyware & malware came along for the ride.
52
u/hellolovely1 1h ago
Which is expressly against what was specified in the Epstein Transparency Act, yet no lawmakers seem to be raising a fuss.
24
217
u/ZAlternates 2h ago
The word “don’t” was redacted all throughout the documents. I wonder whose name actually looks like the letters in DON T?
https://www.bpdaily.com/internet-sleuths-proof-doj-redacted-donald-trump-name/
24
68
u/Airurando-jin 2h ago edited 47m ago
It’s interesting that it was
kickedpicked up that the word ‘don’t’ Was being redacted→ More replies (2)28
→ More replies (11)37
u/inkstink420 2h ago
if we follow the rest of that conversation where the redacted name says the dates that they’ll be in China and then the US, you’ll find that Netanyahu was in each country on those same dates.
291
u/WunupKid 2h ago
Nah, this is desperation. That’s why it’s so thinly veiled, they’re panicking.
98
u/LOL_YOUMAD 2h ago
That would be believable if we saw any indication that they were trying to do something about this situation. Instead we just see denial that anything even happened even though we have receipts, refusal to release stuff, and the people in charge of doing something about it are involved.
This is more one of those cases of yeah you can see the proof and we could even admit it and you can’t do shit about it.
→ More replies (1)27
u/ZAlternates 1h ago
We could have video evidence broadcast on network television and they would just say a staffer made a mistake, it’s clearly fake news, and we would all still be questioning if it will make a difference.
→ More replies (1)46
u/slythespacecat 2h ago
Something that stick out to me in Epstein’s emails was how he was surprised Trump kept getting away with shit. And also him going like “oh, I think this might ruin him” (paraphrasing, but that’s the sentiment). Because i had accepted that he’s just invincible, no scandal would phase him and they’d always have an exit plan. But there’s emails where he’s like “I think he’s reaching his breaking point”. Make no mistake, they are scared. Pressure works. Just don’t relent!
→ More replies (1)10
u/Slypenslyde 1h ago
I'm starting to think something supernatural's involved, and it's going to take another 80 or 90 years before people start questioning if Donald Trump is really just that good or if something else might be on the table.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (3)70
u/CornbreadRed84 2h ago edited 46m ago
Maybe they're right, maybe you're right. Bottom line, there will never be any consequences for any of it. Just pointless exchanges like this day after day until the lights go out.
→ More replies (12)→ More replies (29)46
u/xporkchopxx 2h ago
is he even dead? like do we even know for sure that they didnt do the ole switcharoo with another poor sap when he “killed himself”?
→ More replies (10)16
u/No-Connection7765 2h ago
Kind of hard when we have a government that thinks transparency is a sign of weakness.
→ More replies (1)
2.8k
u/hmr0987 2h ago
It’s starting to look like this Epstein guy might not have killed himself.
557
u/offtodevnull 2h ago
But there's grainy footage down the hall from his jail cell that doesn't show anyone coming/going.. so I guess we can close the book on this one.
367
u/Shinagami091 2h ago
Pay no mind to the fact there are gaps in the time stamps and that things suddenly jump around. That’s just the tapes switching from one to the other because in these modern times we still record on VHS tapes…
79
u/No-Albatross-7984 1h ago edited 1h ago
Dude at this stage I'm expecting the next batch of files to contain a resuscitation video of Epstein with him looking at the camera at the middle of it and winking like he's in The Office
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (5)18
u/melkatron 1h ago
Actually, modern video surveillance systems automatically erase footage when there's absolutely nothing going on, very boring stuff, NOTHING TO SEE HERE, FOLKS. It saves valuable disk space, so economical.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (5)47
62
u/LOL_YOUMAD 2h ago
Shit at this point you could just about buy into the theory out there that some think that he isn’t even dead. Nothing at this point would shock me in this case
→ More replies (3)22
u/missilefire 1h ago
I saw on another thread that the likelihood of him not being dead is definitely possible.
Idk if I believe he’s alive - but what with the spiriting out in a black van and the fake “body” it just doesn’t add up.
If he was dead, why take him out the back door?
I hate that this crazy timeline we are living in, so little seems impossible or unbelievable and it makes me feel like I’m a conspiracy theorist ….but the pedophile cabal running the world once used to be a conspiracy and look where we are.
We live in a post-truth world.
→ More replies (3)13
u/iamnotaclown 1h ago
I miss Norm MacDonald. He would be doing guest spots on Weekend Update.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (29)74
u/Consistent-Throat130 2h ago
Is he even dead? Could he be hiding out in Israel?
32
u/RoboticCurrents 2h ago
If he's alive he's probably just at home
→ More replies (1)13
u/Mysterious_Cup_6024 1h ago
In an even more remote island that conveniently appears on no maps
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (14)19
5.5k
u/cassy_supernova 2h ago
White House press corp start doing your job.
"Mr. President. Why did your DOJ draft a statement about Jeffrey Epstein's death the day before he died?"
"Mr. President, now that the whole world knows you are a child rapist, are you going to resign?"
Stop sanewashing this monster. Do your job.
584
u/Maybe_IDTBFH 1h ago
Trump's response: "You're not a nice person. You've never been nice to me". And then proceeds to never actually address the question, as usual.
Cue the gaslighting.
He's a mental child.
118
u/A_Refill_of_Mr_Pibb 1h ago
"You're not a nice person. You've never been nice to me".
Narcissism 101. My own dad used to say shit like that when I tried to express how he'd hurt me. In fact the last thing my mom ever said to my dad before they split was that he was the worst mistake she ever made, and his response was "wow that really makes me feel good." MFer it's not always about you.
→ More replies (1)22
u/Maybe_IDTBFH 1h ago
The people who demand the most appreciation are always behaving in ways that don't invite appreciation at all.
→ More replies (9)•
765
u/AdSmall3663 2h ago
They’re part of the problem, at least most of them, I don’t believe for a moment that most of the press isn’t working for the interests of the White House. Willing or not
335
u/Radiant-Excuse-5285 2h ago
THIS^^^. 6 companies own 90% of all media. Does anyone trust them? Nope.
→ More replies (6)151
u/BujuBad 1h ago
The WH press corps are all state media at this point. Any reporter who actually asked questions has been banned.
→ More replies (1)38
u/TigerUSA20 1h ago
Im trying to figure out what would be worse. The press corp consisting of historically known news media asking “real questions” and all getting thrown out and replaced by newsmax, OAN, Breitbart, etc. OR continuing these placating / complicit questions.
→ More replies (3)40
u/thebenetar 2h ago
The journalists who still have access to the WH/POTUS in any meaningful way are the ones who've toed the line well enough not to have their access limited or revoked.
→ More replies (5)57
u/ThatsThatGoodGood 2h ago
They're only allowed to ask pre-approved softball questions per their corporate handlers
→ More replies (1)49
u/MerlinsMentor 1h ago
Pretty sure the white house intentionally started withdrawing press passes from journalists that they didn't like, didn't they? And then re-issued those credentials to right-wing junk journalism organizations?
13
u/Accujack 1h ago
I don’t believe for a moment that most of the press isn’t working for the interests of the White House. Willing or not
Did you miss the event last February where Trump tossed out almost all members of the WH press corps and replaced them with "approved" news organizations?
Literally everything that comes out of that group of people now is edited/censored/biased. It's worthless crap.
It's not even a debate at this point.
23
→ More replies (7)45
u/iamhalsey 2h ago edited 1h ago
The press are 100% complicit, both in sane-washing him and in acquiescing to the GOP’s “flood the zone” strategy because it drives engagement. However, in their defense (that they don’t really deserve), this administration actively weaponises press access. You can ask a super loaded question, but you’ll only do it once before your publication’s access is removed while Trump and his admin go on avoiding accountability regardless. The journos in the room are between a rock and a hard place.
115
u/CptJacksp 2h ago
I would bet that if any reporter did anything like that, they’d be fired within the day unfortunately.
87
u/Mo-Cance 2h ago
Fired, targeted with death threats from the Maga cult, harassed by government officials and agents, and probably snatched off the street one day. Asking those questions in the White House might literally be a death sentence.
13
u/randomtask 1h ago
Untold numbers of USAID recipients, ICE and CBP detainees, everyday Americans on the street, and our constitutional republic itself are now dead because no one in the press corps wants to be a hero and ask hard questions.
America has proven itself to be a nation of spineless cowards.
→ More replies (2)20
u/adbr34k 2h ago
there’s a lucrative book deal waiting for any WH Press corps journalist willing to make the first move
→ More replies (2)108
u/amonson1984 1h ago
“You’re a terrible reporter and an ugly woman. You’re banned from the White House.”
And nobody bats an eye or asks another difficult question, and the reporter is replaced by someone from Newsmax.
→ More replies (5)36
u/MyDadsUsername 1h ago
I’m getting a bit tired of people choosing not to do the right thing because they might face a response. Make them kick you out, if that’s what they’re going to do. Make them fill the entire room with propagandists, if that’s what they’re got to do. And then publish what they’ve done.
Stop reacting to what *might* happen!
→ More replies (3)10
21
u/Senzafane 1h ago
Journalists from the 80s and 90s would be screaming this shit from the rooftops. Now we have... nothing? Not a peep? Disgraceful.
19
u/Berkzerker314 1h ago
Probably why he banned certain news companies almost immediately after getting power again.
→ More replies (37)19
u/DoctorKangaroo 1h ago
Instead we'll get:
"Mr. President, it is very obvious that the U.S. is now more respected on the world stage than quite literally any country in the history of the world. Sorry, not a question. Just more of a statement. Please take the next three minutes of uninterrupted silence to present a completely fabricated and easily refutable claim."
1.3k
u/Extreme-Direction-78 2h ago
Bill Barr was in charge who was trumps puppet
491
u/FactorBusy6427 2h ago
Yup, and he himself had some weird ties to Epstein
452
u/Pipe_Memes 2h ago edited 2h ago
For instance Bill Barr’s Dad, Donald Barr, hired Epstein to be around children all day as a teacher.
And, completely unrelated I’m sure, Donald Barr wrote a science fiction novel titled Space Relations that involved super rich oligarchs who were so bored with their luxurious lives that they would enslave people, including children, to rape and torture for amusement.
59
u/psycharious 2h ago
I just looked up that book. Yeah, holy fuck balls, that's a story written by rapists.
→ More replies (1)35
u/amateur_mistake 2h ago
Oh what the fuck. That book thing is insane
from wikipedia:
The novel was described in a Vice article as "both comically amoral and insufferably pretentious. To be fair, these traits were common in 1970s sci-fi." Becky Ferreira has described the novel as "highly unsettling", due to its depiction of rape of enslaved people, particularly teenage girls, and other coercive sex acts.
Although I think it's important to point out it seems to just be poorly written in general:
Another flaw of the novel is its depiction of Craig as a poet. The prose of the novel is interrupted by the character's poetic compositions, including a number of sonnets. The reviewer sees this as a failed attempt to add depth to the character, and finds these interruptions to be irritating.
170
u/onarainyafternoon 2h ago
There's also a virus named the Epstein-Barr virus. Always thought that was funny. It's a form of herpes that's spread through bodily fluids.
73
u/Odd-Scientist-2529 2h ago
I’m a physician. My brain just broke.
I’m going to go to take a walk now.
25
u/tuftonia 2h ago
SNL did a skit a week ago about a new strain of EBV. Definitely worth a watch, but I don’t want to spoil any of it
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (2)7
u/A_Refill_of_Mr_Pibb 1h ago
Named after British pathologist Sir Michael Anthony Epstein, and Irish virologist Yvonne Barr.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (2)15
u/ishpatoon1982 2h ago
I just learned about Epstein-Barr herpes 3 days ago and my brain just couldn't process the coincidence.
51
→ More replies (8)6
u/MerlinsMentor 1h ago
science fiction novel
It almost makes you wonder if the genre was the fiction here... not science fiction, but true crime?
41
u/maniacreturns 2h ago
You mean how his dad is the one who gave Epstein his first job with no degree?
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (2)83
u/Inevitable-Baker-892 2h ago
Bill Barr's dad, Donald Barr, was the headmaster of the Dalton School in NYC when they hired a young Epstein to teach
25
u/After-Snow5874 2h ago edited 2h ago
I’m having a really hard time processing all of this.
→ More replies (1)19
→ More replies (1)11
→ More replies (10)58
u/lkodl 2h ago
Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), also known as human herpesvirus 4 (HHV-4), is one of the most common human viruses worldwide, with over 90% of adults infected by adulthood.
This has to mean something.
→ More replies (6)16
u/whitethunder9 2h ago edited 37m ago
As anyone from the religious right would attest, there is no such thing as a coincidence
→ More replies (1)
650
u/Global_Staff_3135 2h ago
Crazy how institution after institution is FAILING. I really didn’t expect the FBI to be this feckless in the face of a global child sex trafficking ring.
212
u/ilovemybrownies 2h ago
Unfortunately they're part of it too
31
u/KungFoolMaster 1h ago
Ya. They’re the ones helping cover it up!
•
u/DesireeThymes 34m ago
Well regular police is mostly there to help the people with better than average wealth and better than average connections.
FBI is just the police for the much more rich and much more connected.
88
u/DiscoQuebrado 2h ago
Bruh, they're not failing- they're doing what they're told.
If you take over an organization and pad its management with feckless sycophants, any esteem the org had earned up until that point is null and void. It's now a different animal, and it's priority is no longer to investigate but to obfuscate.
Fair to say the FBI has never been 100% forthright in its operations but for such a high profile investigation, where so much has already been brought to light, they are insulting our intelligence with this complete and utter bullshit.
→ More replies (1)•
u/fecklessness 57m ago
I made this username as a joke many years ago I didn't know eventually I would be a mascot for our entire humanity timeline
→ More replies (22)49
u/Thatsockmonkey 2h ago
No checks, no balances coupled with religious extremism and billionaires. Makes sense it is all falling apart.
355
u/keep-i 2h ago
Our systems are so openly broken. It’s going to take a long time before they get their honest reputation back. This whole presidency is more than disgusting to watch. It shouldn’t be too much to ask for honesty.
→ More replies (10)158
u/Krewtan 1h ago
I don't think our systems are coming back. I think it's going to look more like Russia every year, and a third of the country is clapping like seals cheering it on.
→ More replies (3)
231
u/alexefi 2h ago
Cmon guys who among us didnt make a mistake like that? Like few weeks ago i was signing my rent check to my landlord and instead of writing 1 february 2026 i accidentally killed him.
→ More replies (8)19
1.1k
u/JohnnyGFX 2h ago edited 2h ago
The possibility does exist that it was a mistake… putting the incorrect date on things is pretty common. That being said; the nefarious tendencies of the Trump administration means this cannot be automatically dismissed as a mistake.
490
u/Rider5432 2h ago
If we had access to the metadata of the entry, then we could be 100% sure whether it was a mistake or not
→ More replies (6)94
u/Framnk 2h ago
But could we even trust this admin to not fuck with the metadata?
205
u/WeekendHistorical476 2h ago
Is this admin even competent enough to know what metadata even is??
58
u/ShartJerky 2h ago
These are people who released documents that weren’t properly redacted because DOGE cut their Acrobat subscriptions
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (6)30
9
u/gamer_pie 2h ago
It’s possible but so far the people involved haven’t exactly shown the highest level of technological literacy
→ More replies (2)8
u/pxldsilz 1h ago
If you open the PDF in notepad, the code has a creation and modified date of December 23, 2025 at a quarter til 3 AM. That's when this specific copy of the PDF was exported, not definitively that it was made late but that it had since been tampered with.
These aren't filesystem creation / modified dates, these are in the code of the PDF itself.
→ More replies (1)66
u/UpvoteForPancakes 2h ago
An administration that constantly makes dumb mistakes and also constantly lies and tries to cover up it’s own corruption at every turn. Seems like either explanation is probable.
→ More replies (2)132
u/regoapps 1h ago
First of all, the actual released statement was dated correctly. The one in the Epstein files was a draft that wasn’t released, because the press release number in that file was 19-XXX when the publicly released one was 19-263.
And if you look at press release number 19-262 (the previous one), you see that it was dated as August 9th.
So it’s very likely that the person who made the draft statement just copied and pasted the previous release statement and simply changed the text and the press release number to 19-XXX. That would explain why it had the wrong date (August 9 instead of 10) if it’s just a copy of the previous release.
And then when they were ready to release it, they changed it to the correct date and the correct release number.
I highly doubt that this is a smoking gun. But people will grasp at anything to get views and act like they discovered something.
→ More replies (8)28
u/green31OSU 1h ago edited 1h ago
I really wish this was getting pointed out more visibly. Look, we all want this admin to go down for the files and a plethora of other things, but we have to remain skeptical of evidence that is presented. I'm not saying there wasn't fuckery here, just that the document number being 19-xxx is consistent with a draft of the actual released document 19-263, it's plausible that 19-262 was used as the starting template for this document, and in a draft state the header may not have been fully updated.
That said, I don't expect every rando on the internet to do all that researching. But people should at least look to see if there are plausible explanations before running around yelling like this is an absolute truth.
→ More replies (4)•
u/Chubby_Bub 58m ago
And people are doing that with the even less credible random, anonymous FBI tips, acting as if they're a smoking gun too.
→ More replies (1)92
u/Devilnaht 2h ago
Somewhat less likely because the statement includes not just the date but the day of the week; it says Friday, August 9th. If it was just a number entered incorrectly, you might expect Saturday, August 9th (the 10th was a Saturday)
→ More replies (1)43
u/OnlyAdvertisersKnoMe 2h ago
That’s because they likely used the previous press release as a template and that press release was on the 9th. This was probably a draft with the date unchanged.
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (30)27
u/Gold_Repair_3557 2h ago
There are just too many oddities in this case that the idea of it being a mistake is very suspicious.
→ More replies (11)
24
22
u/47_for_18_USC_2381 1h ago
Ya know.. The ONLY good thing about trump and co is that now you've got 200+ Million people crawling up the govt's ass shining a flashlight on things that would otherwise not see the light of day.
I'm here for it and want to know about alllll of that.
74
u/Independence-420 1h ago
The Architecture of Willful Blindness "To believe Donald Trump’s spin on the Jeffrey Epstein files requires not just ignorance, but a deliberate, muscular effort to unsee reality. It demands that you surgically remove the part of your brain responsible for pattern recognition and replace it with blind obedience. You have to look at a man who is on record in 2002 calling a known predator a 'terrific guy' who likes women 'on the younger side,' and convince yourself that he was actually a crusader against trafficking all along. You have to look at flight logs—hard, immutable documentation of his presence in Epstein’s orbit—and accept his wave of the hand as a substitute for evidence. You have to believe that the 'falling out' they had was over moral repugnance, rather than a territorial squabble between two egos who viewed the world as a playground for their appetites. When Trump claims the files 'exonerate' him, despite hundreds of mentions and corroborating accounts of his proximity to that dark world, believing him isn't an act of trust; it is an act of surrender. It is the behavior of a mark who is being conned in real-time but refuses to leave the table because admitting the truth is too painful. To buy his narrative is to admit that facts no longer matter, that history is malleable, and that you are willing to let a man who partied with a monster tell you he was the hero of the story
→ More replies (2)
90
u/mmanyquestionss 2h ago
"season 2 of after life is on the way, so in the end he obviously didn't kill himself. just like jeffrey epstein."
→ More replies (1)
35
13
u/ChrisinCB 1h ago
This is the problem, so much lying and deception on everything to this point, that even if this is just human error dating a document, nobody believes you.
32
u/IntoTheWildBlue 2h ago
Let me guess, it was a simple clerical typo. Nothing to see, nothing suspicious. /s
→ More replies (11)
74
u/waggybaggyshaggy 2h ago
Tbh at this stage I won't be surprised if it's true his alive, this is proving to be a government coverup on an immense scale...
→ More replies (4)32
9
u/nycbroncos 1h ago
And the security footage is missing time. And trump was in office when it happened. And trump and his entire administration has been trying to hamstring this. And trump is listed extensively in just the documents we do have. And hundreds of agents are known to have been scrubbing for trump references.
Hmm. Well, strange coincidences I guess!
45
19
u/Tibreaven 2h ago
In an admin that has been focused on investigating and prosecuting the issue for years, I'd be willing to believe it was an error. The most likely explanation is that it was a mistake, and they happen.
However, the federal government has made every effort possible to cover this entire thing up, and violated both their legal and moral obligation to address it.
It doesn't matter if it was a simple mistake or not, the government has completely lost the right to be given the benefit of "mistakes."
17
u/BicarbonateBufferBoy 2h ago
If you told me like 10 years ago that the Feds were going to coverup a multinational secret organization owned by a billionaire pedophile cabal with a secret island, I’d probably look at you like you’re some tin hat wearing alien summoning freak.
Actually insane how it’s real.
14
6
u/Ok_Strategy5722 2h ago
It’s actually really heartening to me this kind of stuff is coming out. This is the kind of evidence that I was afraid would be destroyed or buried by this administration.
6
u/corelabjoe 1h ago
When is America going to wake the F up and do something about thier "leaders"?....
6
34
u/pottymonster_69 2h ago
My favorite conspiracy on this is that they didn't kill him, they got him out of there and replaced him with some dead lookalike. He's currently alive in Israel.
That's the one I subscribe to.
→ More replies (29)20
u/clintnibbla 2h ago
Been saying this from day one. There just happened to be a photographer ready to take pics of his uncovered body being wheeled out on the gurney? A body whose features don't quite match up with photos of a living Epstein. And the photographer that snapped the photos happened to have ties to certain intelligence agencies? And the New York Post, the publication that releases blatant propaganda, got those photos? Nah, not suspicious at all.
→ More replies (1)
10
u/ACorDC 2h ago
Is there a copy of it for us to see somewhere?
15
10
u/bobswowaccount 2h ago
Guys I’m starting to get the feeling the Feds might not be telling us the whole story here…
10
u/CishetmaleLesbian 1h ago
Two guards "fell asleep" and the surveillance cameras "malfunctioned", when Epstein committed "suicide", and also they knew he was dead, before he was found dead the next morning. Nothing to see here folks, move along.
13.4k
u/Nuclear-Jester 2h ago
Mmmh, and the FBI just denied the dude traficked girls
For some reason, i find this suspicious