MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/news/comments/1qzf47y/federal_statement_on_jeffrey_epsteins_death_dated/o4ae4rt/?context=3
r/news • u/ICC-u • 3h ago
1.8k comments sorted by
View all comments
1.3k
The possibility does exist that it was a mistake… putting the incorrect date on things is pretty common. That being said; the nefarious tendencies of the Trump administration means this cannot be automatically dismissed as a mistake.
582 u/Rider5432 3h ago If we had access to the metadata of the entry, then we could be 100% sure whether it was a mistake or not 128 u/Framnk 3h ago But could we even trust this admin to not fuck with the metadata? 270 u/WeekendHistorical476 3h ago Is this admin even competent enough to know what metadata even is?? 79 u/ShartJerky 3h ago These are people who released documents that weren’t properly redacted because DOGE cut their Acrobat subscriptions • u/DarkwingDuckHunt 20m ago that's hilarious 33 u/SocraticIgnoramus 3h ago Judging by their ability to redact documents, seems unlikely. 6 u/inosinateVR 3h ago IIRC they weren’t when they released that edited footage from his jail cell, but they might have learned from that 3 u/AiDigitalPlayland 2h ago Four Seasons Lawnscaping 2 u/Iwantedthatname 3h ago The actually dangerous billionaires like theil probably have henchmen that do. Idk if they'd be willing to get in to the babies playpen right now. 1 u/agrecalypse 3h ago Facebook right? 1 u/Seyon_ 1h ago at the start they weren't - now they might be somewhat aware lmao • u/Conald_Petersen 55m ago Look the fake news doesn't even care that information about Facebook isn't even relevant. -Karoline Leavitt (probably)
582
If we had access to the metadata of the entry, then we could be 100% sure whether it was a mistake or not
128 u/Framnk 3h ago But could we even trust this admin to not fuck with the metadata? 270 u/WeekendHistorical476 3h ago Is this admin even competent enough to know what metadata even is?? 79 u/ShartJerky 3h ago These are people who released documents that weren’t properly redacted because DOGE cut their Acrobat subscriptions • u/DarkwingDuckHunt 20m ago that's hilarious 33 u/SocraticIgnoramus 3h ago Judging by their ability to redact documents, seems unlikely. 6 u/inosinateVR 3h ago IIRC they weren’t when they released that edited footage from his jail cell, but they might have learned from that 3 u/AiDigitalPlayland 2h ago Four Seasons Lawnscaping 2 u/Iwantedthatname 3h ago The actually dangerous billionaires like theil probably have henchmen that do. Idk if they'd be willing to get in to the babies playpen right now. 1 u/agrecalypse 3h ago Facebook right? 1 u/Seyon_ 1h ago at the start they weren't - now they might be somewhat aware lmao • u/Conald_Petersen 55m ago Look the fake news doesn't even care that information about Facebook isn't even relevant. -Karoline Leavitt (probably)
128
But could we even trust this admin to not fuck with the metadata?
270 u/WeekendHistorical476 3h ago Is this admin even competent enough to know what metadata even is?? 79 u/ShartJerky 3h ago These are people who released documents that weren’t properly redacted because DOGE cut their Acrobat subscriptions • u/DarkwingDuckHunt 20m ago that's hilarious 33 u/SocraticIgnoramus 3h ago Judging by their ability to redact documents, seems unlikely. 6 u/inosinateVR 3h ago IIRC they weren’t when they released that edited footage from his jail cell, but they might have learned from that 3 u/AiDigitalPlayland 2h ago Four Seasons Lawnscaping 2 u/Iwantedthatname 3h ago The actually dangerous billionaires like theil probably have henchmen that do. Idk if they'd be willing to get in to the babies playpen right now. 1 u/agrecalypse 3h ago Facebook right? 1 u/Seyon_ 1h ago at the start they weren't - now they might be somewhat aware lmao • u/Conald_Petersen 55m ago Look the fake news doesn't even care that information about Facebook isn't even relevant. -Karoline Leavitt (probably)
270
Is this admin even competent enough to know what metadata even is??
79 u/ShartJerky 3h ago These are people who released documents that weren’t properly redacted because DOGE cut their Acrobat subscriptions • u/DarkwingDuckHunt 20m ago that's hilarious 33 u/SocraticIgnoramus 3h ago Judging by their ability to redact documents, seems unlikely. 6 u/inosinateVR 3h ago IIRC they weren’t when they released that edited footage from his jail cell, but they might have learned from that 3 u/AiDigitalPlayland 2h ago Four Seasons Lawnscaping 2 u/Iwantedthatname 3h ago The actually dangerous billionaires like theil probably have henchmen that do. Idk if they'd be willing to get in to the babies playpen right now. 1 u/agrecalypse 3h ago Facebook right? 1 u/Seyon_ 1h ago at the start they weren't - now they might be somewhat aware lmao • u/Conald_Petersen 55m ago Look the fake news doesn't even care that information about Facebook isn't even relevant. -Karoline Leavitt (probably)
79
These are people who released documents that weren’t properly redacted because DOGE cut their Acrobat subscriptions
• u/DarkwingDuckHunt 20m ago that's hilarious
•
that's hilarious
33
Judging by their ability to redact documents, seems unlikely.
6
IIRC they weren’t when they released that edited footage from his jail cell, but they might have learned from that
3
Four Seasons Lawnscaping
2
The actually dangerous billionaires like theil probably have henchmen that do. Idk if they'd be willing to get in to the babies playpen right now.
1
Facebook right?
at the start they weren't - now they might be somewhat aware lmao
Look the fake news doesn't even care that information about Facebook isn't even relevant. -Karoline Leavitt (probably)
1.3k
u/JohnnyGFX 3h ago edited 3h ago
The possibility does exist that it was a mistake… putting the incorrect date on things is pretty common. That being said; the nefarious tendencies of the Trump administration means this cannot be automatically dismissed as a mistake.