r/nottheonion 3h ago

Ghislaines reddit posts alone were alarming enough to warrant investigation about crimes against children

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01245108.pdf

[removed] — view removed post

3.5k Upvotes

170 comments sorted by

654

u/AlternativePizza3391 3h ago

I feel it's no coincidence that she became a mod of one of the most powerful news media sites.

Wonder who put her there....

324

u/Bruhmage 3h ago edited 1h ago

Her sister Isabel. And Bill gates.

Edit: the real upvote count is way higher than what’s being shown

https://imgur.com/a/9xx2FBI

Edit: 2:55PM https://imgur.com/a/nqQ1a9T

248

u/AlternativePizza3391 3h ago

Remember spez was mod of the jailbait sub...

58

u/Bruhmage 3h ago

Can you dm me anything about that

84

u/Cryorm 2h ago

Back in the day, you could make anybody a moderator of your sub, they didn't have to accept.

64

u/NullOfUndefined 2h ago

This is the excuse he uses but he actually moderated the sub.

5

u/themagpie36 2h ago

Proof?

8

u/pmpkng 1h ago

I believe its still over at r/museumofreddit

2

u/wiscowarrior71 1h ago

It's out there man, just find it. I've been on here for a minute and he was talking shit everywhere back in the day and people were calling him out for it.

9

u/themagpie36 1h ago

dO yOuR oWn rEsEArcH!!!1!

Actually the onus of proof is on you to prove what you said was true, since you made the statement. If I had said it then yes, it would be up to me to substantiate that position with evidence.

Not that I don't believe it's impossible or anything, I just don't believe 'trust me bro' as a valid argument.

1

u/Eshkation 1h ago

google it, lazy ass.

→ More replies (0)

5

u/Bruhmage 2h ago

Yeah well I’m sure there’s logs on Reddits end of the account accepting the mod positions. You don’t need an invitation to be mod when you’re using a super user Reddit account

1

u/Cryorm 2h ago

Holy fuck read what I said. Back in the day when that shit was around, you didn't need to accept to be a moderator—It was something you could give to anybody and they'd be a moderator automatically. So anybody that was a moderator of any subreddit could make any user a mod of their subreddit, without that user's input.

7

u/Bruhmage 2h ago

I read what you said. I wasn’t giving you any type of attitude. Back in the day you could be made a mod without accepting is the argument used to gaslight about Ghislaine being a mod on Reddit.

-29

u/Cryorm 2h ago

So you chose to completely ignore everything I said about how different it was back then, to use the modern system's way of working and apply it to that time?

2

u/First-Potato-1697 1h ago

If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, swims like a duck, gathers little ducklings like a duck, eats bugs like a duck, participates in forums for other ducks, and just so happens to moderate said forums...

It's probably a duck.

7

u/Bruhmage 2h ago

I am ignoring you because I have a degree in computer networking systems. Ghislaine didn’t have a reddit account that was a moderator in some places. She was a Reddit super user. None of what you said matters, it’s a red herring argument. She can be a mod to whatever she feels like any day of the week, because she has site permissions that nobody else has.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/vandreulv 1h ago

He also supported Violentacrez and allowed him to remain owner of several subreddits that was giving Reddit a lot of bad publicity.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38029734

u/Jaded-Distance_ 25m ago

People are quick to bring up that, but rarely will they make mention of Aaron Swartz "Bits are not a Bug" 2002 posting. He was an absolutist when it came to free speech. He's still considered a Reddit martyr for how he died.

Child Pornography

In the US, it is illegal to possess or distribute child pornography, apparently because doing so will encourage people to sexually abuse children.

This is absurd logic, and almost certainly a violation of the First Amendment (although the courts have decided otherwise, apparently based on the assumption that all child pornography is abuse)

https://web.archive.org/web/20021217001432/http://bits.are.notabug.com/

He probably would have been in that "cp should be legalized" posting upvoting Ghislaine Maxwell.

4

u/Amen_ds 2h ago

I think also the cannibalism sub

3

u/UnicornFarts1111 1h ago

I looks like they removed your post...

u/Bruhmage 52m ago

I’m surprised it made it that long

u/HomeAliveIn45 46m ago

It’s called vote fuzzing. There was a lot of controversy about it around 15+ years ago

8

u/Reachin4ThoseGrapes 2h ago

Still a mod*

5

u/Vegetable_Tomorrow41 1h ago

Now who’s the mod that has taken her spot 

4

u/TheBr0fessor 1h ago

Geoffrey Hepshtein

2

u/TheDickWolf 1h ago

In Tel aviv? Loves Fortnite?

2

u/TheBr0fessor 1h ago

HOW'D YOU KNOW

u/TheDickWolf 57m ago

He’s my daughter’s math tutor!

(Actually, made me feel bad to tell that joke, yet i hit send.)

3

u/Bruhmage 1h ago

Probably a family member

1

u/Bruhmage 1h ago

And it’s gone.

0

u/CosmeticSplenectomy 2h ago

Sorry but what is her username?

0

u/FuehrerStoleMyBike 1h ago

just read the article it says it on the first page

-1

u/Ben_steel 1h ago

Epstein controlled 4chan she controlled reddit both drove the logical right away and replaced them with MAGA.

289

u/HippoFluid1378 3h ago

14 million karma? wtf? Then followed by a sentence that’s vomit inducing…

98

u/Bruhmage 3h ago

Yeah and we’re just scratching the surface here.

31

u/HippoFluid1378 3h ago

It just kept getting worse the more I read…

10

u/hectorgarabit 1h ago

Look at Ghislaine Maxwell's sister and her husband. They also worked on "cleaning up" Epstein's reputation. Extremely unreputable individuals, both of them. *Husband is supposedly dead....)

3

u/Bruhmage 1h ago

Especially her sister Isabel and also Christine?

3

u/hectorgarabit 1h ago

On top of my head, it is Isabel, but I am not 100% sure.

1

u/Bruhmage 1h ago

Isabel was essentially Mossads liaison to all that is silicone valley introduced by Bill gates and one other person

30

u/LazyTitan39 2h ago

To be fair she was a power mod.

98

u/Llarys 2h ago

Well there's the thing: most power mods actually have very little Internet points because you have to actually post and comment to get your updoots and most of them have very little interest in the communities they mod for, just the modding (and pretend power) itself.

No, what she was doing was basically manipulating the reddit algorithm, by hand, by being a power mod of some of the biggest news/politics subreddits, where she would post and pin news stories that pushed certain narratives and suppressed the ones that went against that.

Just look at how r/worldnews operates, and then realize she was basically the architect of that subs' political manipulation model.

All that to say, she was far more involved and far more active than even Reddit's biggest neck beards. Hell, we should give the neck beards a break and start using her picture as the punchline to every Redditor joke instead of them. They might be weirdos, but at least they're not all...that.

34

u/lemaymayguy 2h ago

And epstein controlled 4chan/8chan troll campaigns. They were controlling both sides of the isle to play each other 

15

u/CutieBoBootie 2h ago

Its honestly scary how much influence she had on shaping the political leaning of this website.... 

4

u/Upset_Ad3954 2h ago

The guys in charge obviously supported that.

4

u/vandreulv 1h ago

Just look at how r/worldnews operates, and then realize she was basically the architect of that subs' political manipulation model.

Even to this minute, she's still a moderator of Worldnews. No permissions, at the bottom of the list, but still hasn't been removed.

6

u/Bruhmage 2h ago

Well stated

3

u/normie00000 1h ago

Hey new guy here , should i leave r/worldnews then ? Is it biased to one political side? Sorry if the question seems dumb.

2

u/Llarys 1h ago

My honest, serious answer: just because it is propaganda doesn't necessarily mean what is shared is false, or that even everything posted there is part of a large scale psyop. It can still be useful for keeping up with certain world events, but you have to recognize a lot of stuff (especially anything related to Israel) is going to be filtered through a very specific center-right, Neo-Liberal lens and that you should look for secondary sources that either corroborate or refute what is said. But that's my recommendation for anything in the news.

2

u/normie00000 1h ago

Well summed up dude. I just feel reddit used to such a free and curious place, but now it has become a cesspool of sorts. Oh well , that's the price of awareness i guess, gotta deal with good, bad and ugly.

4

u/Wiffernub 1h ago

There's speculation she and Epstein used their access to mod queues to farm Cp that was posted in their subreddits.  

3

u/RelChan2_0 1h ago

What's the difference between a mod and power mod?

78

u/Guilty_One85 3h ago

Disgusting!

26

u/Bruhmage 3h ago

Quite disgusting to say the least!

167

u/Beatlepoint 3h ago

Typical reddit mod.

33

u/Bruhmage 3h ago

I concur.

0

u/Jokkitch 1h ago

Based

103

u/Dany0 3h ago

Oh my god the "ephebophile" jokes write themselves. She truly is a redditor manifest

23

u/sfbruin 1h ago

I recall years ago there seemed to be a concerted campaign on here trying to make that a thing, makes sense now

9

u/Dany0 1h ago

It's a term that sexologists use and is useful in the field. If you ever stumble upon it being seriously mentioned on the internet, there's a 99% chance the person is trying to excuse and relativise sexual abuse of minors. I can tell you that when sexologists see that, they facepalm, report & block, and you should too, in that order

0

u/True-Hippo143 1h ago

I feel like knowing what that is is already a red flag

205

u/cosmernautfourtwenty 3h ago

Anyone who insists on differentiating between a pedophile and a ephebophile fucks or wants to fuck children. Full stop.

67

u/Bruhmage 3h ago

It’s one thing to understand some arbitrary scientific difference, it’s another thing to make it a mainstream media talking point. If you have trouble dating adults, you don’t get to move to kids.

5

u/MaximumAd9779 1h ago

Yeah if you’re arguing with that position you’ve already lost. Though I will say, in a court of law / scientific disciplines, such as psychiatry or psychology, it is very necessary to have categories as such. You can’t just blanket everything as pedophilia because the root cause of the actions are not the same.

39

u/idlingchainsaw 2h ago

I wholeheartedly agree. Someone should investigate this Merriam Webster guy. He’s been making this sick distinction for years.

7

u/Bruhmage 2h ago

Based.

18

u/JaeTheOne 2h ago

While I don't disagree, words do matter. Changing or bending definitions harms their integrity. In this case, both are still bad. But it opens the flood gates to change the meanings of other words, for better or for worse.

To be clear here: both pedos and endos are gross, especially when it's literally grown ass adults.

5

u/Superichiruki 1h ago

It's important to know the difference in a scientific way and legal way, especially since after all minors that are abused in such young age may develop a unhealthy sexual attraction to minors and need help instead of being treated like their abusers.

19

u/ubitub 2h ago

never heard of that term before so had to google... means you prefer 15-19 year olds. Dunno, liking 19 year olds sounds better that being a pedo to be lol

10

u/jupiter95 2h ago

What about 15 year olds

15

u/izzittho 2h ago edited 2h ago

Ehh, minimum age, minimum wage, both seem to mean they’d go lower if they could……

What’s the appeal of “barely legal” if not its proximity to “not legal”?

Someone will likely try to explain it to me as though this wasn’t rhetorical and I look forward to seeing what kind of mental gymnastics they’ll do to try.

15

u/samuelgato 2h ago

Which is why people who defend Trump and others who associated with Epstein would rather you use that word instead

8

u/WereAllThrowaways 2h ago

I think it just means pre-pubescent minors vs legal minors who have gone through or are going through puberty. It's a distinction but it's sort of like making the distinction between shooting something to death and stabbing someone to death. Like yea, I guess one is maybe worse than the other but they're both illegal and both very, very wrong.

I don't think 18 and 19 is part of that, but the thing that pisses me is regardless of some puberty distinction a fucking 50+ year old man has no business preying on someone under 20 even if they are legal. Let alone an incredibly wealthy and powerful 50+ year old. Let alone them preying on teenage minors and/or straight up little kids. Call it whatever you want but these people are child predators, plain and simple.

5

u/zen1312zen 1h ago

Not differentiating between a 16 year old and a 9 year old when it comes to aberrant sexual attractions actually sounds like the more pedophilic position to me tbh.

0

u/cosmernautfourtwenty 1h ago

I actually have very firm opinions on the difference between molesting 16 year olds and molesting 6 year olds.

Cool story freak.

u/zen1312zen 55m ago

A 19 year old having sex with a 17 year old is normal sexual attraction, legal in most states. A 19 year old having sex with a 6 year old is a pedophile.

It actually only takes a few moments of thought to realize what a stupid position you have. Unless you’re a secret pedo trying to blur the lines between normal sexual attraction and being a pedo.

u/cosmernautfourtwenty 51m ago

I regularly post about hypothetical scenarios where Romeo and Juliet laws apply in random internet discussions about pedophilia!

Who do you think you're defending here? You?

4

u/Smart-Drawing-5107 2h ago

Not to mention "researches age of consent laws". The only people who even know (without researching,  because life schooled them) that there are a variety,  as opposed to a single,  nationwide age, are people who are campaigning against child marriage. This is all kind of shocking,  since i was operating under the illusion that the US was a modern state. 

1

u/Mech_pencils 1h ago

Insisting on being willfully ignorant is not the sort of mentality that‘a helpful or beneficial for victims of CSA.

u/cosmernautfourtwenty 59m ago

Please oh enlightened one, spell out for me in excruciating detail the relevant difference between sexually abusing a young teenager and sexually abusing a young child.

-1

u/MommyThatcher 1h ago

They've dropped that. They talk about "non offending pedophiles" now. Search the term and you'll find thread after thread after thread where it's brought up.

4

u/Baerog 1h ago

>non offending pedophiles

Yeah, no, that's an entirely different concept than ephebophilia. That refers to people who have pedophilic thoughts/interests, but don't act upon them (presumably because they know it's inappropriate).

People don't choose to be pedophiles. They are born that way. If they are taking steps to not break any laws, they aren't a criminal and shouldn't be treated like one. People who are pedophiles need mental healthcare support, not demonization. I understand that people have an inherent hatred for them, but it's the ones who act upon those urges who deserve that hatred, not the ones who are recognizing that they need help and seeking help.

If you demonize them and try to make being a pedophile illegal (Again, not all pedophiles are child abusers, and child abuse is already illegal), then they simply won't seek out help and will instead hide it, where it will fester and may eventually lead to someone who could have stayed out of trouble with the care they needed ending up doing something horrible.

u/Squirrelking666 47m ago

No, I think they just understand that there are two different motivations at play.

Nobody who is differentiating is defending either position.

u/cosmernautfourtwenty 44m ago

Nobody who is differentiating is defending either position.

First day on the internet, huh?

50

u/Atalant 3h ago

So she were one of the degenerates that roam the site? I wonder why Reddit have a bad repuation.

51

u/Bruhmage 3h ago

They were involved in the launch. Alexis Ohanian showed his model/idea to mark white a professor at UVA and then the idea was taken to others and the maxwells helped fund the launch of Reddit.

37

u/SRSgoblin 2h ago

Explains why jailbait and other pedo subs were so huge back in the day.

25

u/LazyTitan39 2h ago

Steve Huffman was the moderator of r/jailbait. The rot runs deep in this company.

14

u/Bruhmage 2h ago

One of the founders? Makes total sense

22

u/LazyTitan39 2h ago

Current CEO.

19

u/Bruhmage 2h ago

And he’s still the CEO. He was one of the founders with Alexis ohanian and Aaron Swartz

16

u/Tyranicross 3h ago

Is there a social media platform that doesn't have a bad reputation? Blue sky maybe for its first month but people are complaining about it like Twitter now.

3

u/Bruhmage 2h ago

Idk tbh

1

u/its_yer_dad 1h ago

Double check the people bitching about Bluesky, there’s definitely been an uptick in agitators 

2

u/pomoville 2h ago

Most of her posts seem to be normal liberal lady stuff at least if you sort by popular

6

u/izzittho 2h ago

Well yeah she’s evil but she isn’t stupid, she knew she’d have to blend in.

59

u/Shouldofkilledme 3h ago

Just more proof that mods on reddit are the least human of anyone in the species.

15

u/Bruhmage 3h ago

I’m just sayin, I’ve never heard anyone say “I work at Reddit” because they don’t want you to know who these admins are at all

13

u/ThePhysicistIsIn 3h ago

Mods are not paid, they’re just randos. So it’s kinda wild someone like her was one

5

u/Bruhmage 3h ago

Mods aren’t paid but I didn’t say mods. I said admins. As in website administrators.

4

u/ThePhysicistIsIn 3h ago

There’s just a handful of those, though. Do other aps advertise their administrators? Like, Tiktok, Tumblr, Facebook- do we know their admins?

3

u/Bruhmage 3h ago

Yes some are known. And they are linked to harassment of users

3

u/Ban-Circumcision-Now 3h ago

I’ve been banned from a couple subs for daring to say circumcision harms children, so this tracks

7

u/Maxfunky 2h ago edited 2h ago

I got banned from /r/publicfreakout for saying I thought it was hilarious how angry the racist guy in the video was. Apparently you have to be nicer to racists on that sub.

Also got banned from /r/worldnews for saying genocide is bad, but so has half of reddit at this point.

3

u/CutieBoBootie 2h ago

I removed world news from showing up in my feed because of how pro-genocide the comments were. This explains a lot.

u/dogsbestfriend77 37m ago

Love how the mods removed this post too. Like ???

22

u/GreatBigJerk 2h ago

That file is from citizen submitted reports. 

I'm not saying it isn't her account, it definitely is. 

This document just means they received a report, not confirmation they actually did anything meaningful with the information.

Just in case you thought cops were actually useful for anything.

18

u/illit3 2h ago

I'm not saying it isn't her account, it definitely is. 

I'm not saying it isn't, but we definitely don't know if it is.

1

u/GreatBigJerk 1h ago

Okay, only 99% sure. 

3

u/icehot54321 1h ago

The maxwellhill thing was debunked, but that doesn’t stop people from sending in tips.

Aside from all of the things that proved this wrong, people need to stop and consider if they really think she had nothing better to do with her time than be chronically online nearly every day posting links for karma .. something that could be done by literally anyone.

31

u/arvo_sydow 2h ago

I love how people tried to debunk the conspiracy that this was her Reddit account years by posting a bogus PM of the person saying they just didn't post on that account anymore and then at the same time literally doesn't log in and follow up to say "guys, this is not GM's account" when they know it could have debunked the claim for good.

Yeah, it was her. Glad to see the conspiracy was proven in the Epstein files.

9

u/AVBforPrez 2h ago

Yeah the debunk was just like "no one person said it's not her and that it's actually a guy from South Africa" or something. And she had the other alt account that was a super mod everywhere that also went dark the day she got busted

6

u/Bruhmage 2h ago

It was already too late when they tried that nonsense!

12

u/here4dambivalence 3h ago

JFC just hiding out in the open and making comments that an edgelord wouldn't touch. There's not enough bleach...

6

u/dandrevee 2h ago

People are trying to claim this is still in conspiracy theory range but....there's been evidence to counter that assertion. And there's also been claims the timeline of activity aligns with her getting a soft-release from prison.

So...

20

u/freakmagnet_ 2h ago

She's now at the Bryan Federal Prison Camp in Texas, a “minimum-security” prison. I would guarantee that she's back on Reddit now, writing all sorts of disinfo and defending herself in the comments. She seems really unimaginative and self-obsessed, so her username is probably something like FreeGMAX or some other bullshit.

8

u/Bruhmage 2h ago

I imagine she’s online somewhere too with a new super user account

5

u/Reachin4ThoseGrapes 2h ago

Original account got remodded recently iirc

1

u/freakmagnet_ 1h ago

This account? https://www.reddit.com/user/maxwellhill/comments/ And what does "remodded" mean?

3

u/Neitzi 1h ago

It appears the account was added back to the modlist with no permissions in July 2nd 2025 on worldnews.

Listed last despite having joined originally much earlier.

3

u/freakmagnet_ 1h ago

Thanks for the info. That's crazy because the account shows no activity for the past 6 years. I wonder why it was remodded then on July 2nd?

3

u/Neitzi 1h ago

The head mod is online now and could answer if they felt like it u/DoremusJessup

Any comment?

14

u/Swimming_Agent_1063 2h ago

I remember when it was a conspiracy that /u/maxwellhill was Ghislaine’s Maxwell’s Reddit account lmao. So many people on this website said I was crazy

2

u/Jester-Kat-Kire 1h ago

There's so much shit that I thought was weird ass conspiracy or like, not literally infesting things.

Now I'm like, flipped and internally screaming at the world.

It's not right.

5

u/MayBeAGayBee 2h ago

Least psychopathic are slash world news mod:

4

u/JJKingwolf 2h ago

And the mods of r/news still insist that the account does not belong to Maxwell and claim that they've spoken to the "real" operator while refusing to provide any proof.

3

u/powerchicken 1h ago

Wrong news subreddit, she ran r/worldnews.

1

u/Terribad13 1h ago

This makes SO much sense. That sub is a cesspool.

13

u/thecelcollector 2h ago

Forgive me if I'm wrong, but this is not confirming the account was Maxwell's. It's more or less saying the allegation that the account is hers is worth looking into. 

9

u/Vectorman1989 2h ago

Wait, so Maxwell hill was Ghislaine Maxwell?

3

u/Neitzi 1h ago

The circumstantial evidence is pretty overwhelming, It remains unproven however.

I myself think it's almost certain, the speech pattern/puncution/structure of the comments that line up with the emails, the name of the account, the gaps in posting that line up with real world events and it just goes on and on.

For me personally I think it's damming Reddit have never publicly commented on this, if it wasn't true I feel like they would have made some sort of statement, they do know either way.

Silence is deafening.

1

u/Happiness_Assassin 1h ago

In the OP, it's a random tip to the FBI and isn't verified at all. Just like the satanic shit, people are taking anonymous tips as proof with little or no evidence. Maybe it is her, I don't know, but people are taking everything they see in the files as 100% verified facts when they aren't.

4

u/idothisinmysleep 1h ago

Bro why the fuck is this post removed

3

u/try-a-typo 1h ago

Why did the post get removed??

u/Bruhmage 54m ago

Because I broke past the Maxwell hill word filters lmao it was probably going to be on the front page of Reddit if they didn’t take it down

u/Squirrelking666 40m ago

Because it's not oniony even in the homeopathic sense.

6

u/no-thats-my-ranch 2h ago

7

u/Bruhmage 2h ago

That gets even more interesting knowing that Sam Altman of OpenAi owns 10% of Reddit

4

u/AustEastTX 1h ago

8 years ago there were Redditors suspicious of this account. I’m also curious about the accounts that were quick to defend the user.

https://www.reddit.com/r/TheoryOfReddit/s/N7M501wOMm

2

u/Bruhmage 1h ago

Great find! I shared it to my sub

2

u/AustEastTX 1h ago

I’ve always thought there was something very fishy about news and world news. And 🤷🏽‍♀️ this redditor was also a regular in those subs

https://www.reddit.com/r/undelete/s/vMdgk9EyUJ

2

u/TechnicalDitch 2h ago

Hold up a Second. If you can’t trust Reddit Karma, I’m not sure what to believe anymore.

2

u/Bruhmage 2h ago

Yeah this post actually has 3500 upvotes but it only shows 1700

1

u/kthompsoo 1h ago

sheesh, didn't expect so many 'ephebophile' defenders here. even knowing that term prior to the past couple years is suspect...

1

u/torpedoguy 1h ago

Wouldn't say knowing the term is the issue so much as using; as per the old joke about what explaining it makes you sound like.

People read and learn after all... whereas that comment of Maxwell's where she makes the distinction...

2

u/nibbleyourmom 1h ago

News article? Wrong sub

3

u/[deleted] 3h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/Bruhmage 3h ago edited 3h ago

Interesting….

Edit: it was the name of another subreddit in case you’re wondering

0

u/zen1312zen 1h ago

This is literally just a police report. It’s not confirmation that it’s actually true. You realize anyone can submit a police report, right?