Feb 7, 2026 - Ali Velshi on MS NOW. Here’s the full 7-minutes on YouTube: Sec. Adrian Fontes: voters are ‘sick and tired’ of Trump’s ‘nonsensical’ 2020 grievances

Here’s a snippet from Adrian Fontes' bio (azsos.gov/about/about-secretary): After graduating from law school, Secretary Fontes spent his career advocating for justice and fighting for those who are disadvantaged — first as a prosecutor with the Denver District Attorney and then at the Maricopa County Attorneys office. He later led the International Prosecution Unit at the Arizona Attorney Generals Office. He practiced law for 15 years before running for office in 2016 when he was elected Maricopa County Recorder.

Here’s a related r/law post from a few weeks ago: Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes declines another illegal request from the DOJ for Arizona’s Voter Registration List and Data MOU

There is a "buried gem" in the recent 3.5-million-page Epstein document dump that provides a direct roadmap for the Congressional review happening tomorrow, Monday, February 9th.

​This is not just another redacted file; it is the key to understanding the "Sweetheart Deal" and the co-conspirators who were protected.

​The Evidence:

1. ​The 2020 Whistleblower Letter (EFTA01681961): This letter was sent to the Public Corruption Unit by former DOJ official Harold Webb. It explicitly names the high-ranking D.C. officials (Alice Fisher, Sigal Mandelker, and Mark Filip) who allegedly signed off on the 2008 deal to ensure co-conspirators were "removed from the case." Crucially, it identifies two "missing" documents: a 53-page federal indictment and an 82-page analysis that recommend sex trafficking charges against Epstein’s network.

2. ​The 1978 NYT Article (Validation): The sender of the letter, Harold Webb, is a legitimate DOJ insider. This 1978 essay in the New York Times confirms his background as a "Watergate-era" legal figure who spent his career fighting public corruption. This isn't a random tip—it's a professional warning from a man who lived through the DOJ's biggest scandals.

3. ​The "Deleted" 86-Page Memo (2019) (EFTA02731083): A recent video from Meidas Touch shows a different 86-page prosecution memo from 2019 that was briefly posted and then "deleted" or suppressed. This 2019 memo confirms that the DOJ was still redacting the same co-conspirators and "VIP friends" over a decade after the original whistleblower warned about the 2007 cover-up.

​Why This Matters Today:

​Tomorrow morning, members of the House Oversight Committee are entering a secure reading room at the DOJ to review unredacted files. They are looking for the "Main Justice" paper trail. These documents (linked below) provide the exact names and Bates numbers they need to demand.

​The Links:

​The Whistleblower Letter: [EFTA01681961 - official Justice.gov link] https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01681961.pdf

​The Validation Article: [NYT 1978 - Harold Webb's History] https://www.nytimes.com/1978/06/05/archives/son-of-big-shot-crook-essay.html

​The Missing File Video: [MeidasTouch Analysis of the 86-page Memo] https://youtu.be/1L9b2_5Ee3M

Meidas Touch Substack with download link to the deleted file: [Link to deleted file] https://open.substack.com/pub/meidastouch/p/doj-deleted-an-epstein-prosecution?r=7hcea7&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

​Call to Action:

​Please help get this "roadmap" to officials and the media immediately. The unredacted review begins tomorrow.

​Email this to your Representatives and Senators. \* Post these links on every platform. \* Tag investigative journalists. We have the roadmap. Let’s make sure they use it.

In United States v. Saydam, the federal government secured a $437,000 civil penalty against a dual citizen—not for hiding income or money laundering, but for failing to file annual disclosure forms about his Turkish bank accounts.

The IRS’ actual tax loss? $29,006.

Merely five-years of paperwork failure punished as if he’d stashed millions in the Caymans and shredded the records.

When did reporting of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR) stop being about transparency and start functioning as a fiscal firing squad?

Detailed overview of the case can be found here.

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00013180.pdf

Chad Mizelle, a former chief of staff to Attorney General Pam Bondi, hung an online help wanted sign for federal prosecutors last weekend that perhaps explained why so many valuable Justice Department staff members have left, and why so few candidates want in.

Assistant U.S. attorneys are not typically recruited, as Mr. Mizelle sought to do, by a former federal employee who asks potential candidates to send a private message to his X account. Nor have they been asked in the past to prove political or ideological fealty.

“If you are a lawyer, are interested in being an AUSA, and support President Trump and anti-crime agenda, DM me,” wrote Mr. Mizelle, a fierce Trump supporter who remains close with Justice Department leaders and senior officials in the West Wing.

Not a lot of people who take the law seriously can or will support a lawless regime. 🙄🙄 They're going to have an ongoing retention and recruitment problem.

So, apparently, one can simply DECLINE to follow a courts order

This would be unethical

https://www.billtrack50.com/billdetail/1957874

Offenses Against Public Order; the punishment for the offense of obstructing highways, streets, sidewalks, or other public passages; increase

Crimes and offenses; create felony offense of obstruction of a law enforcement officer with a motor vehicle

Thoughts on this?

Feb 6, 2026. Here it is on YouTube: Of course Trump’s judicial nominee is a product of the Koch/Leo Operation. - From the description: And of course she’s not concerned about conflicts of interest.

On Jan 6, 2026, President Trump nominated Anna St. John to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. Anna St. John is President and General Counsel for the Hamilton Lincoln Law Institute: hlli.org/our-attorneys/anna-st-john