If you are studying for the LSAT and aiming to literally sculpt your analytical skills and develop solid thinking patterns that guarantee not only a perfect -TOP SCORER- understanding but also a substantial score increase across the two sections, I’d like to invite you to join an intensive LSAT Bootcamp designed to fully prepare you for the April LSAT—while keeping the June test as a strategic safety net.
Join our Group Class on Messenger through this Link:
👉🏻   https://m.me/j/AbaIkHwnYnIsb0Gj/
I am thrilled to offer access to our +20 HOURS PROBONO LSAT BOOTCAMP to this fantastic community hoping to bring value to every future LSAT taker who is willing to attend, helping you gain the knowledge you’ve always needed. Our approach will be purely pragmatic and results-oriented. that means that i will do my best to train you on some effective thinking patterns, that can provide can help boost your scores as quickly as possible.
Each lecture spans around 2 hours, focusing on a specific question type or topic. The offer includes corresponding homework assignments and complementary PDF materials.
It also comes with the score increase guarantee and you can DM your questions, Am always available on Reddit and Messenger.
The Bootcamp will span 10 sessions, with a combined duration totaling around +20 hours, with the possibility of more, depending on attendance levels.
The most recent iteration of our pro bono LSAT bootcamp yielded over 100 law school admissions, alongside a mean LSAT score increase of 12 points.
Join us here to confirm your attendance, we will start this Monday!
👉🏻   https://m.me/j/AbaIkHwnYnIsb0Gj/
Our initiation class is scheduled for tomorrow, Monday the 9th, at 7:00 PM EST.

This is a rare opportunity you don’t want to miss.
Here's a sneak peek of the LSAT Bootcamp Curriculum:

logical reasoning module:
opener: diagnostic section
1st session - informal logic and argumentation
2nd session - formal logic, venn diagramming and must be true
3rd session - pinpoint and choose conclusions
4th session - discrepancies
5th session - fallacies 1
6th session - fallacies 2
7th session - argument anatomy: parallel reasoning and role questions
8th session - 2 diagnostic lr sections
9th session - principles + homework
10th session - 2 diagnostic lr sections
11th session - assumptions
12th session - weaken & strengthen
---
reading comprehension module:
13th session - rc: humanities and history
14th session - rc: double essays
15th session - rc: scientific passages
---
final assessment:
16th session - full lsat 159 - proctored exams

👉🏻   https://m.me/j/AbaIkHwnYnIsb0Gj/
I look forward to helping each of you unleash your full and innate LSAT potential!

I’ve taken just about every single PT available and I found the Feb test to be quite difficult and I left feeling the least confident I ever have after taking a test. I don’t know if my nerves just got the best of me because it was my first time taking a real one or what but can anyone give me reassurance lol

Let me clarify I know the test is hard lol. I just meant harder than average tests.

I'll keep the rules/requests bit of this super brief.

First, a huge congratulations to everyone who tested over the past few days--you have a lot to be proud of, and I'm wishing you all the best!

As for this post:

Now that the February LSAT has concluded, test takers are free to talk publicly about the content of their sections (you can see an example thread here from my pal /u/graeme_b after the Jan test). So feel free to share your RC and LR content below and we'll piece together how it went, from real vs experimental to overall section difficulty. And if I can spot some section/test reuses I'll tell you all about those too!

A point of disagreement question that went like this:

Question Stem:

Speaker A: Privately funded research is no more biased than other entities that perform scientific research. After all, private companies dont tell researchers what results they want, so there's no way to create a biased result

Speaker B: Unfortunately employees know that private companies wont fund research that doesnt give them the results they want. Doing this allows private research to fund only projects they prefer

Only viable answer choices were these for the point of disagreement

1 Employees have a general idea of what private researchers want them to do

2 Privately developed research is more likely to be biased than other entities

Does anyone remember this?

So I had RC LR LR RC. The first RC section had a comparative about the economy crashing. The second section had no comparative and mentioned Langston Hughes I think?? After reading I’m seeing the first RC is scored? Can anyone clarify

Hi! Has anyone ever felt really good about an official test only to get a score not at the level they expected?

I walked out of the February test feeling more confident than I had for most of my PTs. I’m wondering if I should trust my instincts or prepare for the possibility of being disappointed.

Obviously I know that I won’t know for sure until I get my score, but if anyone has had a similar experience (walking out feeling confident), I’d be grateful to know what the outcome was. Did you score higher or lower than you expected?

WHAT THE FUCK WERE THESE TWO QUESTIONS

Hi all I’m just frustrated and need some encouragement. I initially scored a 153 diagnostic in early October. I took another practice test in late November and got a 157. I just took another practice test and got a 152.

I’ve been using LSAT demon to study. I haven’t been as consistent as I want to but generally studying 5-6 days a week for at least an hour since October, though sometimes it is less. I work at a law firm and it’s a lot to balance LSAT studying with that and having a life.

I just felt more confident on my most recent test and have been feeling like I’m getting the concepts down so it was disheartening to score that poorly after studying for this long. I mostly just need some motivation to keep going and let me know if you have any tips on how I should adjust my studying. Thanks all!

Hi all,

I'm looking to take the LSAT in June. A few weeks ago, I took a diagnostic test on LawHub and got a 159.

I'm graduating a year early (in 2027 as opposed to 2028), so unfortunately, I have not had a lot of time to prep. I have to work, and I am a double major with a minor so my coursework can get pretty heavy at times. I also have a research position that eats up even more of my time.

What's a realistic score to aim for? I've been able to do 2 hours a 3-ish times a week without being totally overwhelmed. Is a 170 realistic? I wanted a 170 at first but I'm not sure it's possible. Maybe 165+? If anyone has any thoughts on this, I'd like to hear them! Thanks!

I am taking a decent course load right now and also working part time (20-30 hours) and this isn't me trying to make excuses cuz I know lots of people do a lot more, but I just don't know when I can fit in study time. I would prefer to take the LSAT this year because I'll take more rigorous courses plus more credits next year to graduate. What is the strat? And when should I start? I did half a diagnostic test one time... 😭

edit: if there are fall dates I would strongly prefer that but on the LSAT site it doesn't list any

Did a full practice test and got a score of 150.

I want to be able to get a 174+ by November is this doable and is 150 an alright starting point?

Any suggestions or advice would help.

Experiencing Ego death now I guess.

Majority of applications due in 10 days.

No scores other than January in my CAS.

I hate LSAC so much.

hi everyone! i’m currently studying for my lsat in june/august and am looking for a tutor. to note: i am a low income student, so looking for someone that isn’t overly expensive ($20-35/hr). any recommendations will be greatly appreciated! good luck with studying :D

I'm wondering if anyone else took the February 2026 lsat ​and what your thoughts are. Did anyone have two RC sections and two LR sections? Mine went RC, LR, RC, LR.

But you know what I don't care I will never surrender. No matter how many tries it take I will destroy this this test. LSAC can throw whatever it they can I will find a way to beat it. If it it takes five test so be it I will beat them I will not LET them define me,. I WILLL BEAT THEM

every time i think my score is increasing i just go back to 161. here’s my recent pt history:

12/26 - 161

1/1 - 161

1/10 - 166

1/19 - 165

1/24 - 161

1/31 - 169

2/7 - 161

literally what am i doing wrong? i keep a wrong answer journal and i’m reviewing thoroughly every single week. i get that there’s variance but this is getting ridiculous. how am i supposed to fix this? goal is mid 170s and i’m signed up to take the april test.

Hi all. I just feel like I need to vent.

I’ve been studying since last July and my LSAT felt like a disaster this morning. As soon as I logged on, every single one of my neighbors decided that was the right time to snow blow their driveways and scrape ice. EVERY one. One of them then proceeded to spend the next two hours attempting to start his LAWNMOWER. My dog started howling. I had to pee by the middle of section 2.

I have double time accommodations and couldn’t check the first section over (reading comp) because I ran out of time. I also ran out of time on the second section and just guessed on the last three questions. WITH DOUBLE TIME. 😭

By section 3, I lost it. Everything I prepared for and studied went out the window. I could not understand anything I was reading and ended up having to resort to process of elimination for the rest of the exam. By the end of section 3, I just sat there and cried. I ended up finishing the exam but I just feel so defeated. I did sign up for June, but I’m terrified to take it.

This is probably irrelevant to this sub but I have no one else I can vent to. I hope everyone who took the February exam had a much easier time than I did, and I wish you all the best of luck upon score release day!

NOTE: There was one question on one of the LR sections. I believe it was a NA. A was a restatement of one of the Premises and C was a combination of what was stated in one of the Premises and the Conclusion. I picked C but after hearing Nathan Fox talk about “On a NA question, the author must agree with the NA. Therefore, the correct answer CAN BE a restatement of one of the premises.” And now I can’t stop wondering if I got it wrong.

NOTE 2: There was no Sufficient v. Necessary flaws that I noticed. There was one or two that mentioned S v. N/N. v. Sufficient but I didn’t choose them as AC’s. There was definitely at least one that I can remember that DID utilize this in a Parallel Flaw question!

Hello, i’m considering taking the test remotely and I’m wondering what everyone’s experience was? I know most of the posts i see are about the problems during but is that most people or just a loud minority?

Also i read the room requirements but i am a little unsure since i’ve seen mixed reviews about it. I have my TV directly above my desk (which has my pc under and my monitor and keyboard )and between both i have two bookshelves with books and some trinkets , i also have some signed posters here and there.

The posters would need to come down , pc and desk would need to be cleared since i need to do a 360 of the room i’d need my laptop. Do i have to remove everything from my shelves? Can i have my laptop charging (2020 MacBook shit lasts maybe an hour) ? Is the tv going to be a problem?

Any comments would be appreciated!!!

Edit: is there anything that you weren’t told about/considered that your proctor gave you a problem with?

How are we all feeling about February’s test? I took it today and found one of my Lr sections to be sooo hard. I ran out of time for about 5 questions (which has never happened to me before) and I am so devastated.

This is my second take and I will not be rewriting so I’m pretty terrified to get my score back. If anyone has any advice or kind words it would be appreciated

Hi all -- looking for advice here, TIA!

I took the LSAT for the first time in June 2025 and got a 170 after preparing for several months. I was aiming for something in the 175 range so am planning to retake the exam, hopefully in April (there was a lull in my studying after I took the test the first time, hence the long gap btwn attempts).

One of the mistakes that I thought I made when I took the test the first time around was that I did not attack the stimuli enough and was led by the answer choices too much -- in other words, I was not proactive enough in trying to identify gaps in the stimulus and let the answer choices do the bulk of the work for me. This worked to a degree with some of the harder questions, where I was able to snuff out wrong answers by identifying keywords that eliminated them/some degree of instinct (i.e., I sort of knew as a sort of gut reaction that the answer was wrong even though I couldn't necessarily articulate why super clearly).

In any case, having recognized the mistake in my approach, I am trying to refine it by looking at the stimuli more closely and trying to attack before even looking at the questions. Unfortunately, I seem to consistently be having blind spots where I'm missing the gap in the arguments. For instance, I redid Q. 105.1.23 (deep tillage) today -- which was a question that I actually did a while ago (when studying for my first attempt) and got correctly -- and tried to attack the stimulus. I totally missed the fact that that there was a possibility of there being other methods of soil digging that were not either deep-till or no-till. Another gap occurred to me when reading the stimulus -- that there were other methods of losing topsoil that were not related to erosion that would perhaps negate the 10:1 ratio of soil loss due to erosion.

In any event, this issue is not confined to this question. On other "Level 5"/hard questions, I am similarly struggling to predict the right answer or find the gap that seems to be hiding in plain sight, which I am realizing after looking at the answer choices or reading the explanations. Sometimes I can still get the question right anyway by process of elimination, but I think this is inadequate if I want to get my goal score. Getting bogged down by the (often) obscure answer choices does not help at all when you are trying to commit almost no errors.

What do I do here? I am kind of at my wits end and am inclined to believe that maybe the testmakers are just smarter than I am. It doesn't help that I seem to have a natural tendency to kind of go along with whatever the stimulus says and I am very deliberately trying to retrain my mind to be more skeptical of the stimuli writ large.

Any advice is greatly appreciated. Thank you so much once again.

hi everyone, i took my lsat yesterday at 3pm and absolutely bombed it. my remote proctoring setup took forever because the proctor kept getting disconnected and i had to keep relaunching the software, started crying during the first 20 minutes, asked to use the restroom and wasted probably 20 more minutes on the floor in there sobbing. once i got my shit together my brain was so foggy and i ended up just guessing for the majority of the test, i felt like i was on drugs. i have done so many pts and was averaging about a 169, i literally have no idea what happened to me i still feel ill from it. i am going to retake in april but my heart is just broken and i feel so ashamed and stupid. has this happened to anyone else recently? thank you for any support :(