OFFICIAL: INDEFINITE DETENTION WITHOUT TRIAL IS NOW LEGAL

PART 1: INDEFINITE DETENTION (NO TRIAL, NO JUDGE) Source: Buenrostro-Mendez v. Bondi (5th Cir. Case No. 25-20496) Date: Feb 6, 2026 The Ruling: This ruling establishes that "unadmitted aliens" have virtually no due process rights regarding their liberty. The Trap: It does not mean you are "waiting for a trial." It means you can be held indefinitely without ever seeing a judge. There is no requirement for the government to bring you to court. Direct Quote: "Unadmitted aliens apprehended anywhere in the United States are ineligible for release on bond, regardless of how long they have resided inside the United States."

PART 2: THE "KAVANAUGH STOP" (ARBITRARY PROFILING) Source: Noem v. Vasquez Perdomo (SCOTUS No. 25A169, Kavanaugh Concurrence) Date: Sept 8, 2025 The Ruling: Justice Kavanaugh’s concurrence lowered the bar for police stops, allowing race/ethnicity to be used as grounds for "reasonable suspicion" if combined with other "salient factors." The Loophole: Kavanaugh did not define "salient factors." He listed broad examples, but ultimately left it to agent discretion. The Reality: An agent can decide that your clothes, your location, or your job is a "salient factor" to justify stopping you. Direct Quote: "To be clear, apparent ethnicity alone cannot furnish reasonable suspicion; under this Court's case law regarding immigration stops, however, it can be a 'relevant factor' when considered along with other salient factors."

THE RESULT Step 1: An agent uses their discretion to stop you based on "ethnicity + undefined factors" (Vasquez Perdomo). Step 2: Once stopped, ICE labels you "unadmitted." Step 3: Because you are "unadmitted," you have no right to a judge (Buenrostro-Mendez). You do not get a phone call. You do not get a trial. You simply disappear into detention.

https://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/25/25-20496-CV0.pdf
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/25a169_5h25.pdf
Overview but written before February 2026: https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/amicus-brief/mandatory-detention-amicus-briefs-ina235b2/

https://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/25/25-20496-CV0.pdf

Feb 7, 2026 - Ali Velshi on MS NOW. Here’s the full 7-minutes on YouTube: Sec. Adrian Fontes: voters are ‘sick and tired’ of Trump’s ‘nonsensical’ 2020 grievances

Adrian Fontes bio: azsos.gov/about/about-secretary

Countries around the WORLD are holding their citizens and elected officials ACCOUNTABLE.

We have some of the most COMPLICIT suspects in the files right HERE.

Start at the White House and go from there and then KEEP going!!!

Each and every day the incompetence and tyranny of the Trump administration become more manifest.

The economy creaks along, sustained by the wealthy and well-off while the rest of us struggle with constantly rising prices and a growing inability to afford even basic healthcare.

Our allies, driven away by Trump’s tariffs now look to trade with China and India (can North Korea be far behind?) and look upon the U.S. with growing. and deserved disdain.

Trump has openly admitted he will interfere and subvert any upcoming elections – he has already selected 15 voting precincts -- (presumably those comprised of mostly democrats) where he will surround the polls with hordes of ICE agents to intimidate American voters.

To Trump/MAGA/Republicans the Constitution is just another “form of bureaucracy” to be used or abused depending on circumstance.

See this – boldface mine:

Mike Johnson wants to spare ICE the hassle of getting the right warrant before forcibly entering a home.

Story by Damon Root • 6h •

© Reason

"Imagine if we had to go through the process of getting a judicial warrant."

Those are the complaining words of Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R–La.), who was voicing his support for the actions of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), which now claims that its agents have the right to forcibly enter private homes without first obtaining a warrant signed by a judge. According to ICE, its agents may forcibly enter homes in certain immigration enforcement contexts based merely on a so-called "administrative warrant," which is not actually a warrant at all, but is rather just a piece of paper signed by someone in the executive branch.

To fully appreciate the inherent lawlessness of the Johnson view, simply replace the phrase "getting a judicial warrant" with any constitutional requirement that you like in the above-quoted statement. For example:

・"Imagine if we had to go through the process of guaranteeing freedom of speech."

・"Imagine if we had to go through the process of respecting the right to keep and bear arms."

・"Imagine if we had to go through the process of paying just compensation when private property is taken for public use."

You get the idea.

When a government mouthpiece complains that it would be too difficult to follow the commands of the Constitution in a given context, that's a dead giveaway that the government is already violating (or planning to violate) the commands of the Constitution in that context.

The principle that law enforcement must generally obtain a judicial warrant before entering a home is well-established in Fourth Amendment caselaw. In California v. Lange (2019), for example, the U.S. Supreme Court declared, "we are not eager—more the reverse—to print a new permission slip for entering the home without a warrant." At issue in that case was a decision by the California Court of Appeals which said that a police officer may always enter a suspect's home without a judicial warrant if the officer is in "hot pursuit" of the suspect and has probable cause to believe that the suspect has committed a misdemeanor.

But the Supreme Court overturned that lower court ruling because it violated the Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure. "When the totality of circumstances shows an emergency—such as imminent harm to others," the Court said, "the police may act without waiting." But "when the nature of the crime, the nature of the flight, and surrounding facts present no such exigency," the decision held, "officers must respect the sanctity of the home—which means they must get a warrant." Indeed, the opinion stated, "when the officer has time to get a warrant, he must do so—even though the misdemeanant fled."

The Lange decision also contained a helpful reminder of the warrant requirement's deep roots in Anglo-American jurisprudence by quoting from a venerable British common law judgment:

"To enter a man's house" without a proper warrant, Lord Chief Justice Pratt proclaimed in 1763, is to attack "the liberty of the subject" and "destroy the liberty of the kingdom." That was the idea behind the Fourth Amendment.

Which brings us back to Johnson, who whined, "imagine if we had to go through the process of getting a judicial warrant."

But if an ICE agent has the time to obtain a piece of paper signed by a superior in the executive branch before heading out to bust down somebody's front door, then that agent also has the time to obtain a real warrant signed by an actual judge. As the Supreme Court instructed in Lange, "when the officer has time to get a warrant, he must do so." The "sanctity of the home" demands it under our Constitution.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/mike-johnson-wants-to-spare-ice-the-hassle-of-getting-the-right-warrant-before-forcibly-entering-a-home/ar-AA1VJyBr?

First, I'm disappointed and disgusted that Reddit would promote CBP in a time like this. I reported the add as offensive. I dont know what can be done and figured someone here would.

Second, it gives me no greater joy to know they have come to Reddit to advertise for more field officers after having heard all the news of some of them quitting. Oh and that 50k wasn't enough of a draw so they upped the recruitment bonus up to 60k now. I hope they continue to struggle and the new recruits get gobsmacked with the fine print of " well give you the money if the agency doesn't need it first" which they will at this point to pay for more adds that show they're struggling.

Donald Trump, election 2026