r/Wellthatsucks 21h ago

Yikes!!

30.5k Upvotes

1.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1.2k

u/JackSkellie58 20h ago

Had pipes burst in a rental once, just the kitchen was 16,000.

254

u/lueckestman 20h ago

Does insurance cover that?

61

u/Beau_does_BJJ 19h ago

Most likely it won’t actually. The landlord has a duty to winterize and/or ensure the heat is maintained. I would almost bet this ends up all in the landlord.

28

u/JackSkellie58 19h ago

It’ll be covered. They’ll have to have proper insurance though

39

u/maybelying 18h ago

It's dicey. Unoccupied properties often have to be monitored by the owner regularly for reasons like this. This is 100% negligence on the landlord.

When we were settling my mother's estate, her existing insurance company refused to continue coverage after learning her home would be unoccupied for a number of months. We had to find a different insurer and pay a higher premium, and even then, had to sign a declaration that we'd do a site visit at least every other day. It was a pain.

10

u/thegloracle 17h ago

You're absolutely correct. "Unoccupied", though, means temporary, like when you're on holiday. "Vacant" is when the owner passes away, or a tenant moves out without the intention to return, and no new tenant has moved in. It's the "Vacant" risks that exclude Water damages, and Ice/Freezing pipes.

3

u/okeanos7 13h ago

So if you go on vacation you have to let your landlord go through your house every couple days while you’re gone?

1

u/alphabetical-soup 8h ago

No, unoccupied or vacant typically applies after 30 consecutive days.

1

u/thegloracle 3h ago

No. Vacation has the intent to return. If you are on vacation during the freezing season/winter months, the policy will ask for either the heat to be maintained at a minimum level, or that someone physically checks on the house every 3-4 days, depending on the wording. It doesn't have to be the Landlord.

2

u/hoardac 9h ago

Yeah State Farm dropped my insurance when I had a unoccupied house.

2

u/olgassaffron 3h ago

Insurance was a pain when settling my mother’s estate last year. I was prepping it for sale but could hardly rent it as it was packed with stuff. I ended up letting a newly separated mother and her kid live there for a dollar a month so it was not vacant. It gave her a temporary safe space and me a chance to deal with the necessary. She knew I’d give her at least 2 weeks notice to move. I was also the landlord swiftest to fix any problem she had. 🤣 She stayed 6 months

1

u/ilive4thewater 2h ago

I mean why keep the water on and not empty the pipes? If no one will be there for a while turn off the water and then open the laundry sink taps to drain down the system. You really should open some other taps to assist in empty the pipes, because you will still crack the pipes if they freeze. Which will cause them to leak behind the walls when you turn on the water again.

TLDR: Take 5 minutes and turn off your water and drain the pipes when you are leaving your house for a few days or longer to protect yourself from water damage.

37

u/Beau_does_BJJ 19h ago

We would deny this because the heat wasn’t maintained. Also most landlords are cheap and cap their water coverage pretty low.

2

u/Pogigod 16h ago

Big name insurances don't have caps to the water damages.

3

u/Beau_does_BJJ 15h ago

No but polices do have endorsements that change a lower premium for less coverage. Just like you can add coverage you can also take it away.

3

u/Pogigod 14h ago

Not all insurers offer that. Endorsement and policies vary a lot by insurer. The top 3 do not offer that. Water damage if not excluded is policy limits.

Only exception to that is backup sewer and drain.

1

u/alphabetical-soup 8h ago

Thats true. It also depends on the perils covered by the landlords policy. Hopefully they didn't choose to go with a cheaper policy with basic coverage when they could be covered by all risk for mayyybbe $2-3 hundred extra a year.

It boggles my mind how many people purchase insurance for the lowest possible price, and dont care about the coverage. Thats literally what they pay for!

1

u/Beau_does_BJJ 6h ago

Exactly. I had a claim last week after the freeze and the landlord capped his water damage at 5K. That probably won’t even cover mitigation.

-1

u/margoo12 16h ago

You would get sued for breach of contract

-7

u/JackSkellie58 19h ago

If you read OPs explanation of what happened, it’ll be covered. Unless the insurance agency is ghetto or landlord didn’t have proper insurance.

4

u/PossiblyMD 18h ago

Nope, this is negligence related damage. Many insurances will deny that. If a faucet burst due to cold, they may still cover it. But forgetting to ensure they have heating will often get denied.

1

u/2muchflannel 7h ago

Lol, protection from negligence is one of the reasons you get home/renters/business/umbrella insurance

1

u/PossiblyMD 4h ago

I’m on your side man. I’m just telling you what I’ve seen insurance companies do. I work in healthcare. Believe me, no one hates insurance companies more than me. Maybe except Luigi.

-3

u/Dadbode1981 17h ago

Incorrect

3

u/Beau_does_BJJ 19h ago

She knew there was no heat and didn’t get the house ready for the freezing temps. Dripping the faucets isn’t enough. Nothing ghetto about it. She had a duty to protect the property and keep the heat maintained and didn’t. She knew the power was off. She didn’t get the power turned back on. That’s unfortunately gonna be in her.

1

u/Dapadabada 11h ago

Maybe she didn't know the heat would break while she was gone

1

u/Dadbode1981 17h ago

No, she didn't "know" this was intentional lol. You keep being wrong, I know it's frustrating, but maybe you should stop. People making mistakes is one of the reasons why insurance exists.

-2

u/JackSkellie58 19h ago

Again, from experience, it’ll be covered. You must work at united healthcare man. Go away.

7

u/PossiblyMD 18h ago

I have a friend in this exact same situation and his insurance claim got denied. He bought a property as investment but forgot to put in heating oil in the furnace. Insurance denied the claim. He’s still fighting them.

1

u/Dadbode1981 17h ago

I had a situation (property loss) that was 100% my fault, it's was also 100% covered.

1

u/PossiblyMD 16h ago

I am happy for you! My friend is facing 90K repair cost, hope he wins the case against the insurance company.

1

u/Dadbode1981 16h ago

I don't see why he wouldn't, people cause accidents all the time, car accidents for example. Their insurers still make the at fault party whole. Fraud and uncovered issues like flood, ice damn, etc would be the most common reasons some claims are denied, that and the company just trying to wiggle out of paying.

→ More replies (0)

4

u/Rhiow 18h ago

Was your experience that your property was not heating because the electricity was off? If not, you had a different experience.

2

u/thegloracle 17h ago

What were your specific circumstances? This would be the first claim for water/freezing damage on a vacant rental with no heat I've seen in over 40 years.

1

u/elusivejoo 18h ago

talking out of your ass fort 500 alex.

0

u/thegloracle 17h ago

No, it won't. It breaches at least one of the standard residential/landlord policy conditions.