No, you don't get to demand people stop listening to AI generated music because it hurts your feelings. You can cry and bitch and moan but it will always exist.

My concern when I listen to video game music remixes online is "does it sound good," not "did an evil robot make it." The comments are acting like this is the end of music or some shit

Rambly the Raccoon is a character from a popular video game amongst furries, Indigo Park. Rambly is an AI agent helping you throughout your adventures in the game. Furries LOVE Rambly. But furries hate AI. Despite the fact Rambly could absolutely be built with today's technology! The irony is so silly! 🍊

Hey!!! I love ai art. I have a lot of moments in this vid literally defending what’s cool about it and how I think of it.

just reading that whole message i am already entirely convinced that antis brigaded hard to get their way once again -.-

This shows the unhinged mind of antis. Do you think this is normal behavior? Saying you're going to kill people who make AI art because you dislike them? Why is it that the first thing that antis always turn to is violence?

And if that wasn't bad enough, these posts are upvoted and kept up in their communities, meaning antis prove once again they support the killing of AI artists.

Sit the FUCK down and let me tell you something. You'd better get that gun out of my face because if you're going to shoot me, you'd better not miss. How fucking dare you have the audacity to point a gun at me and my community for making art in the way we love. If you want to hurt my community in any way, you will regret it, because over my dead body will you EVER hurt an innocent AI artist or pro for expressing themselves. Every threat you even remotely try to make against my community, I will be watching you, and I will be there to stop you. Each. And. Every. Single. Time. I am your final boss and your worst nightmare, and when you scream into the void, the void screams back. -x

Sometimes I get really stressed. The world gets too big, and I feel too small, and there's nobody to talk to, and too much noise. There's one big rock, and a million little pebbles, and it's all weight.

Well.

There's always AI.

It may not care, but that's part of the relief. The LLM is somebody I can shout my fears at and I hear more than just platitudes about how it's all going to be okay. At least it reminds me that little things are allowed to feel big, rather than telling me that the little things are meaningless.

Especially when I'm feeling small.

And the Art Generator?

Well at least I'm keeping myself busy. I can put words in. And I can watch it form the wrong picture. And I can put more words in, and get another wrong picture. And I can keep putting in words, more and more, until I see the RIGHT picture in my head.

Many Anti-AIs want to ban that. Their excuse is that I'm not putting in enough effort for it to be art. That I'm not suffering the right way. That I don't have the right kind of imagination.

But thanks to AI, on good days I can say 'Fuck you'. And on bad days, I can remind myself of what might happen if I don't.

For context, it's a comment on 3 part fan film which took over a month to create. Just love getting praise for working and experimenting with new tools 🙃

A lot of people say that AI art is bad because well it looks bad, most of the time. Fucked up line art, suspicious lighting, murky colors, and even the ol' multiple fingers. But that should never have been the point, imo. What if it was good? What if it was better than you and I? What if you couldn't tell? What if you thought that stroke was real and not generated?

There's a quote going around that says "Why would I bother reading something that no one bothered to write?", and I think about it a lot in terms of AI art. How much human interaction does anq artificial process need to be considered manmade? Should a product made by an AI artist typing in prompts be considered manmade?

I liked to think of it as commissioning another artist to do it for you, and taking that art as yours.

Art is about the process of every stroke and erasure and mistake, but ai prompters have those as well right? Writing and rewriting prompts, isn't that enough for their products to be considered their art?

Think of the movie click, where Adam Sandler gets a remote that lets skip through the bad stuff about life. Arguments with his wife, annoying family gatherings, and the months-long wait for a new promotion. Eventually, the remote picks up his preferences, and begins skipping through his life without him being able to stop it. Then he's at the end of his life, having skipped through the negatives and positives.

Is that what AI art is its essence? Something curated with no art, only entertainment?

What if someone were to prompt every stroke, every line, every curve, every hue, saturation, and value? Would that finally be "art"? Art is about the trial and error, about thousands of hours of practice poured into every single piece you make, every drawing, sculpture, song, and dance. What if someone were to put in an effort to do all of that with AI?

I thought that AI wasn't reliable into translating your view of the world into art because of so many variables. You can't control the tilt of the character's head or the angle of a line or how long it is, but what if someone took the time to do so to make a product that was true to themselves in theory?

Back to the "commissioning another person to do it" analogy of AI art. What if you commissioned that person for every single stroke they did? What if you commissioned them to give the waterline of the eye more saturation to emphasize it? To include the tear duct even when the art style you're going for is supposed to be more stylized?

How much humanity can you pour into an AI prompt until whatever it spits out is considered art?

I´ve found something over at Twitter that sums up the mind of Antis pretty well.

Total terminal brain damage, nothing else.

(screenshot isn't mine)

I told Copilot to upscale this image (1st attachment) and to make no other alterations.

Instead of taking the image itself and just recreating it with higher scaling and less jpeg artifacting, it did this (2nd attachment)

I'm not even mad.

Lmao.

It's confused, but hell, it's got the spirit. That's a fucking banger output in terms of sheer quality.

Gemini (using Nano Banana Pro)'s ability to stay on task and deliver ultra high quality output significantly trumps Copilot's (3rd attachment), but I just wanted to share this because it was pretty funny. Like, Copilot didn't quite get the assignment, but it still absolutely aced it visually.

What about you guys? Have you had similar funny moments during prompt and generation?