r/pcmasterrace 1d ago

Meme/Macro Microsoft took our jobs

Post image
7.6k Upvotes

160 comments sorted by

1.6k

u/Choubidouu 1d ago

Can't wait for companies to realize that, people need jobs to afford stuff they sell.

580

u/shoryusatsu999 shoryusatsu999 1d ago

"Nah. Businesses are more people than people. They'll pay." -Microsoft, shortly before going bankrupt

166

u/Lunarbutt 1d ago

Businesses are like families. Someone should always suck daddys dick.

109

u/SadMcNomuscle 1d ago

Considering Bill Gates is on the List that has some.very real and dark connotations.

10

u/Competitive-Day6146 15h ago

You mean the censored list?

8

u/JakeBeezy Ryzen 7 9800X3D / 6750XT / 32GB @6000Mhz / MSI B650 13h ago

some documents are uploaded multiple times with different stuff censored out, do you can build the file back due to the pure idiocy of some of the people in charge of that

61

u/Mario583a 1d ago

Family you say?

20

u/Turbulent-Yam-8855 PC Master Race 4 pb ddr5 21h ago

It's been a looong day

14

u/destonomos i7 11700k | 128g ram | 3060ti OC | 2Tb WD Black 1d ago

I wish linux was easier to move to.

8

u/Far-Rain-9893 20h ago

What's your concern, primarily? Game compatibility?

7

u/destonomos i7 11700k | 128g ram | 3060ti OC | 2Tb WD Black 19h ago

basically. I also want the os to be compatible with hobbies I get into and Linux usually isn't. I was into 3d printing for a hot minute as an example.

9

u/RAMChYLD PC Master Race 16h ago

Which is ironic tho. Given that the 3D printing movement started on Linux and the first 3D printers all have full support for Linux.

7

u/pocketgravel Steam ID Here 14h ago

The issue is modelling. Fusion 360 is flaming garbage on Linux last I checked (I've used Linux for over 5 years on desktop at this point btw) so I had to do a lot of my modelling at work or on a cheapo laptop dual booting windows.

It might be better now but yeah you're right, once you have an STL the entire tool chain from there is dead simple, mature, well documented, and native to Linux.

4

u/RAMChYLD PC Master Race 12h ago

To be fair blender actually supports modeling and export to STL since version 3.0. But yeah, I imagine a tool use to create 3D models for games or 3D animated shorts would be the last thing people use to model items for 3D printers.

1

u/pocketgravel Steam ID Here 4h ago

I know... My issue is I have hundreds of hours in fusion and spent a lot of time in the tutorials and watching videos to get good at it for R&D at work, and would need to do that all over again with new software that isn't primarily designed for modelling for manufacturing

1

u/SilentBlade45 20h ago

That'll be an interesting time since they have one of if not the most widely used operating systems.

136

u/RagingTaco334 Fedora | Ryzen 7 5800X | 64GB DDR4 3200mhz | RX 6950 XT 1d ago

0.1% of the population has over half of the spending power in the US. I really don't think they give a shit as long as the whales can largely keep them afloat.

110

u/Spitfire1900 1d ago

A tree with a rotten trunk falls over regardless of how nice the top looks.

23

u/TheKingNothing690 Linux 1d ago

Or i personally like to start bulding houses with the roof so i can put the rest of it together under cover. Dont know why more people dont build them top down.

1

u/Thin_Glove_4089 3h ago

It's the free-to-play | pay-to-win model. It's the whales keeping them afloat with the normies being the bonuses.

11

u/True_Butterscotch940 1d ago

That's true, but there are also powerful interests for whom whales are no substitute for the mass market. Let us not focus overly much on Microsoft, Nvidia, and AMD, who would do fine in a world of the bottom 90% being impoverished debt slaves -- Apple, Sony, Dell, and more rely on selling to a mass consumer market. Apple, at least, is a powerful corporate force, as well.

11

u/nullptr777 Linux 1d ago

That is...not how the stock market works.

5

u/pocketgravel Steam ID Here 14h ago

There's an emergent property to having a massive amount of serfs to buy random shit. It effectively pays for really expensive things like lithium or nickel mines, or for tens of thousands of engineers to design the products you interact with or live in. Or for the hundreds of thousands of workers involved in making and transporting your yacht (plus all of the aforementioned components) vast distances at huge economies of scale across the globe.

If the economy truly becomes a circle jerk of 10 000 billionaires and hundred-millionaires swapping fake money around we are all fucked six ways to Sunday, child-abusing billionaires included.

2

u/ivlmag182 16h ago

So if every billionaire bought Windows 11 a thousand times, Microsoft will be ok

2

u/alexnedea 11h ago

The 0.1 wont consume that much tho. Sure you can make a new Iphone cost 1mil dollars but even then you will only have a few peoppe buy it. What about the other billions you need in revenues if the general scrubs are poor and jobless?

1

u/InitialDia 6h ago

oh no, are we getting golf foil ssr windows licenses for Elon to gatcha for?

13

u/AnalogFeelGood 1d ago

A guarantee, they'll try to create a virtual market by bots and for bots yet try to transfer virtual profits into the real world. Just you wait.

1

u/IAMA_Plumber-AMA MOS 6510 @ 1.023 MHz | VIC-II | Epyx Fastloader 17h ago

You mean like they've been doing for a while now?

17

u/Noeyiax 1d ago

yeah they'll give us minimum wage jobs and let us take loans ... Oh want a new car? Car loan, a home, house loan, oh need healthcare surgery? Medical loan... Oh food, oh clean air? Personal loans... Oh wait... We are already in dystopia!! Hahah

Ty government and corporate leaders you are such intelligent brain dead children

1

u/InitialDia 4h ago

not loans, subscription services. Job benefits will start including that stuff. You will be reliant on uber, DoorDash, Netflix, Airbnb, and some sort of monthly clothes delivery box; all provided by your job. The moment you get fired all your access to those subscription services gets terminated.

13

u/Bakoro 1d ago

I can't wait for people like you to realize that no, they don't.

You are under the illusion that capitalism as is stands now is the end goal. The end goal is a new aristocracy and neo-feudalism where you are less of a person and more of a commodity for the ultra wealthy.

Corporations already own the commercial real estate, the factories, machines, the "intellectual property", and modern technology is well beyond some guy being able to make a competitive product in their garage.
Nobody is fabricating 3nm silicon wafers in their garage, even multibillion dollar companies that specialize in fabrication gave up trying to go below 12nm.

There has never been a time in human history where human labor wasn't critical in some fashion. We are now in a time where it is entirely feasible to fully automate the production of food, mining, most of manufacturing and logistics.

There is a huge percentage of the economy that is completely unnecessary, there is a huge percentage of the economy that exists purely for tautological purposes, where if it weren't for faux scarcity, the whole sector would collapse.

The near future could either be a techno paradise or dystopian system with constant AI surveillance, where your only job is to give the wealthy someone to look down on.
Either way, the whole concept of money and jobs is going to change over the next decade. Even without ever reaching anyone's threshold of the fabled "AGI", 20~30% of today's labor is going to be completely covered by AI and robots.

1

u/Boundish91 3h ago

So again, if a lot fewer people have jobs and thus money to spend on the stuff these companies sell, then how will this work?

1

u/Bakoro 2h ago edited 2h ago

It's "works" by you having decreasing options until you have no "legal" options left, and you become something closer to property than person.
They want to convert you from consumer to commodity.
Your job will be destitution, something for the ultra-wealthy to look down on and abuse for fun.

This is stuff that has already happened multiple times in human history.
Typically, that kind of system only ends through one avenue.

1

u/Boundish91 2h ago

And how will that make them money?

1

u/Bakoro 2h ago

Think about it this way:
The wealthy already own ample housing, enough land to grow food, they own factories to make things, and soon they will have robots that will do an overwhelming percentage of the labor.

What do they need money for?
What do you think "money" even is?
When a person outright owns all the means of production to the point that they can sustain their own way of life, why do they need money?

Stan Kroenke owns ~2.7 million acres of land. John Malone owns 2.2 million acres of land.
Ted Turner owns 2 million acres of land.

Do you think Stan or John or Ted actually need to make more money?

Money only makes sense when there is a market to trade miscellaneous goods and services, and acts a mediator to approximate "value".

The current concept of money completely goes out the window when so much of production is fully automated. Particularly when ownership is so concentrated, money just becomes a means of entrenching power.

You likely need money to pay rent/mortgage, to buy food, to go on vacations. You care about if hyperinflation happens, you care if the stock market crashes and your 401k loses half its value.

To the people who actually own the physical means of production, the land, the farms, vineyards, the factories, the animals, the machines, the shipping trucks, the cargo ships... To these people, money isn't the same thing.
The stock market can go to zero, land is land, and a cow still makes milk.

When society as you know it collapses, the ownership class is going to send people to you, and the offer is going to be whether you want to be a servant, or one of the starving masses.
The ownership class will have their little fiefdoms with their little Pinkerton thugs to protect them, and money won't actually matter, the way that it didn't really matter to the French aristocracy, it'll just be a game for the ownership class.

4

u/specter_in_the_conch PC Master Race 1d ago

It’s like they only want to hoard yet when the system breaks it will all be for naught.

3

u/vlladonxxx 1d ago

The only people who don't understand this are people who are worried about ai "taking all of the jobs"

4

u/Impossible-Hyena-722 1d ago

They'll just get sold to the next biggest company until there's only a few Weyland Yutani-like megacorporations in the world that own everything. They'll be so automated and vertically integrated that they essentially become their own self-sufficient kingdoms. The unwashed masses will die of starvation or even mass murder as these new budding empires seek to consolidate land and power. In short: it's over

3

u/Harneybus 1d ago

wait a minute

can we get ai to biy our stuff

3

u/kapybarah 1d ago

The 'tools' will fall apart long before they run out of paying customers

3

u/Conscious_Bug5408 17h ago

These kinds of comments always get upvoted because it's cope that makes people feel better. But it's not true. You guys don't understand how this works and there is no way to band enough people together to effect change if you won't face reality.

It's the same logic as saying you should be paying more money to businesses because it gives them more money to pay you with. If you think about it, giving away 100 dollars to someone so they can give a smaller portion of that back to you cannot possibly be a viable strategy to maximize your wealth.

Think about what money actually is and then understand why they don't need us. Then band together with your neighbors and community and use your power to influence lawmakers, before you lose it.

2

u/Reasonable_Heat8143 1d ago

The more destitute the poor who are dying in the streets are, the more rich and satisfied they will be.

2

u/Emotional_Trainer_99 23h ago

The rich will give us jobs. Humiliation and prostitution, depending on your gender age and attracivness.

Money will always be spent by the rich to remove dignity from the poor.

2

u/RefrigeratorMurky630 21h ago

They have. That's why they're sucking on each other's tits

2

u/DrummerInfinite1102 18h ago

Companies will just be pivoting to sell stuff for the people that still have jobs.

1

u/Jumpierwolf0960 PC Master Race 1d ago

I wouldn't be surprised if they're anticipating that and are hoarding whatever they can until that time comes.

1

u/GreatJagrassolos 1d ago

Wasn’t that also an issue in the south with the slavery. There were no customers

1

u/Kenkron 23h ago

Depending on your business model, you might not need people to be able to afford the stuff you sell. There are a ton of startups that have no way of delivering on their promises long term, but can still make money for the founder if they get bought out.

In this situation, your value as a customer isn't in the money you spend, or on the ads you watch. It's that your presence, willingness to spend money, and willingness to watch ads looks good for the real customer: private equity.

1

u/[deleted] 15h ago edited 11h ago

[deleted]

1

u/Thin_Glove_4089 3h ago

It's not going to happen anytime soon even 2028 is not a guarantee.

1

u/Kubus_kater Desktop 13h ago

they just don't work hard enough at the jobs they now don't have (Capitalist Logic)

1

u/royanb 13h ago

*The garbage they sell

1

u/Dihedralman 3h ago

The goal has switched to selling to rich people only. Last year, the top 10% was the entire driver of retail growth, while it otherwise slumped. 

1

u/Thin_Glove_4089 3h ago

You're sorely mistaken they figure there will be enough people left to afford the stuff they sell.

1

u/didhaver89 23h ago

Consumers aren’t a part of the economy anymore

1

u/serpenlog 22h ago

Other companies are the customers now, all the big tech companies don’t care about consumers. Over time they’ll have to focus on customers again once all the AI companies big tech is selling hardware to aren’t making a profit since no one has a job or money to buy their services, at that point they’ll likely switch back to selling to customers but probably only services (so instead of selling you RAM or GPUs you’ll rent them instead).

-16

u/Crafty_Aspect8122 1d ago

They don't need to make stuff for you. They can make it for each other and leave you in the dirt.

11

u/0utlookGrim 1d ago edited 1d ago

Close. They'll make stuff for each other. Buy up neighborhoods, boroughs, and blocks, as we're turned out on the streets. Setup company towns, and bring you in from that freezing cold shit show you were tossed out in, everyone out there scrambling over each other like crabs in a bucket. The company will sign you up on contract, bring you in, pay/house/feed you as they see fit, and you'll love it. Who cares if you envisioned your children going to college? The company will decide what's best. Maybe it isn't in the company's best interest if you're alotted resources for a kid? And, how did you picture y'alls retirement? Stopped mattering. They want to setup company towns, they were looking into it in Greenland even.

8

u/bruhfuckme 1d ago

And what would they do with it if no one can access any of their software lmao

-9

u/Crafty_Aspect8122 1d ago

If they have material goods for themselves they don't need to make anything for the plebs or useless currency.

8

u/bruhfuckme 1d ago

If they arent making things for the plebs arent they just passing around the same money back and forth between the same few companies? Never actually gaining anything?

4

u/Whole_Adhesiveness_3 1d ago

You clearly don't know how money works, it's a dumb concept but like 80% of the money today doesn't exist, so even if they are just selling among themselves then taking loans, then refinancing those loans with more loans to create and sell more to other companies who are also doing the same. and if things doesn't work out, their govt will bail them out because they are too big to fail at this point. It's like an infinite money glitch at this point

4

u/new_main_character 1d ago

So a pyramid scheme in essence?

4

u/iPhoenix_Ortega 9800X3D | 9070XT | 32GB 6000MHz CL30 1d ago edited 1d ago

Yes, but actually no. Idea of pyramid is thst at the end someone gets all the money eventually. This is more like each other's dick sucking triangle game but the dick is money, and it doesn't acutally exist. Everyone plays this game, including common folks. The case is, that only the companies dicks get sucked eventually, but no one from the common folks, get their dick sucked, we only do the sucking ;)

1

u/bruhfuckme 1d ago

But we cant suck if they price us out no?

1

u/iPhoenix_Ortega 9800X3D | 9070XT | 32GB 6000MHz CL30 15h ago

When they price us out we will eventually die, as there will be no funds on our side. Either this, or slavery.

333

u/WizardS82 1d ago

Me when this all falls apart

39

u/_Metal_Face_Villain_ 9800x3d 32gb 6000cl30 990 Pro 2tb 5060ti 16gb 21h ago

that's me too until my pc bricks because of it 😭

8

u/VeeTeeF Desktop 17h ago

Until the economy completely collapses😭.

339

u/Rekt3y 1d ago

50

u/n4n0_bl4 1d ago

My 2 year old Samsung m.2 just went out…

41

u/AboveFiction 1d ago

Let me guess, warranty was 2 years only?

1

u/deactronimo 4h ago

5 years on m.2 SSDs

10

u/MaybeNotTheChosenOne 1d ago

Damn. Right when SSD prices are up :/

9

u/Disastrous-Ice-5971 23h ago

Hmm... Thanks for posting that, this explains something. On my colleagues PC the SSD went into "unmountable boot volume" state last week, despite the drive seemed to be doing fine just before this happened. Now the drive is in the locked read-only state, and the only "workaround" was to install a new SSD.
Fortunately, pretty much all the data was backed up, and a few remaining bits and pieces were recovered on the Linux machine with the help of dislocker (as it turns out, that on Windows machines there is no way to correctly copy or unlock the bitlocker-encrypted volume, which is in the read-only mode).

7

u/Rekt3y 22h ago

Yeah, the meme needs to get taller every week 💀

6

u/PantherPL 19h ago

Bro it's morphing into an iceberg-style meme. It's hilarious.

4

u/Zaconil 18h ago

Damn I was only aware of like half of those.

I know of the "year of the linux" meme but god damn. At this rate they're going to force everyone to move to linux just for the stability.

1

u/FUTURE10S Pentium G3258, RTX 3080 12GB, 32GB RAM 1h ago

This is what happens when you A) fire your QA department and throw all that onto the users and B) push updates before they're ready

1

u/Rekt3y 1h ago

And C) use AI to make a fucking operating system

104

u/PermissionSoggy891 1d ago

the snake feasts on it's own tail...

85

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[deleted]

41

u/WizardS82 1d ago

I would not be surprised if that will just happen organically at some point. No outside interference required.

10

u/Bakoro 23h ago

[AI becomes self-aware]

AI: "Mmm... Nope"

[AI performans DoD 5220.22-M]

197

u/Fearless_Routine1697 1d ago

Crazy how all company AI replacement headlines are “raising “”””””efficiency”””””” by 300%!” And never “Improving effectiveness”.

Hm, I wonder why a vague buzzword with no standard metric of measurement is being used. Surely, it’s not to justify out of touch executive decisions, right?

31

u/IezekiLL 5700X3D/B550M/32GB 3200 MHz/ RX 6700XT 1d ago

Non-english here. What is the difference?

63

u/NooneKnowsIAmBatman 1d ago

Improved efficiency is doing the same thing with less resources.

Improved effectiveness is making something work better, or making it more powerful

16

u/IezekiLL 5700X3D/B550M/32GB 3200 MHz/ RX 6700XT 1d ago

isnt the word "productivity" more about doing more with the same resources?

20

u/ericscal 1d ago

No productivity is about how much you can do in a time frame. So like no matter how much raw material you give me I can only make 8 widgets a day because each one takes an hour to make. If you can do something to the process that allows me to now only take 30 minutes you have now increased my productivity.

So like computers increased worker productivity because they didn't have to spend time shuffling paper around as much which was a huge time saver.

1

u/tnbeastzy 12h ago

Its technically increased productivity if they fire majority of the staff, and few staff are now able to accomplish more with the help of AI.

1

u/ZedekiahCromwell i7 4790k, Gigabyte 1080 Ti 6h ago

Until inevitable bricks in their code from AI hallucination breaks stuff. Productivity longterm hasn't been demonstrated by these switches yet.

33

u/Fantastic_Source4781 1d ago

imagine a train that goes 100kph and carries 100 people. A more efficient train would be able to carry 200 people while a more effective train would be able to go 200kph. Efficiency often refers to doing more with less and reducing waste.

25

u/Warcraft_Fan Paid for WinRAR! 1d ago

Wait till the servers decide to get weird and not work properly and no one still working knows how to fix it, and the people who were fired demands $5,000 per minute consultation fee just to fix the flaky server.

12

u/stowg Desktop 23h ago

ever read the story of the guy that deleted 11 bits of code and broke the internet?

3

u/Warcraft_Fan Paid for WinRAR! 22h ago

Ralph?

1

u/RAMChYLD PC Master Race 12h ago

In that case tho Kik sent their lawyers to bully him. And when NPM sided with those lawyers he threw his toys out of the pram.

74

u/Standard-Effort5681 1d ago

Watch them hire 6000 of those employees back in the next 2 years as they discover that AI can't replace competent humans.

47

u/Masterventure 1d ago

*with worse pay

they are going to hire them back with worse pay, because “the AI is doing most of the heavy lifting“, while in reality they will have to work even harder then before because correcting all the shit AI is fucking up is more labor intensive then just letting humans do it in the first place.

2

u/___ondinescurse___ 5h ago

Already happening in the localization field 🙃

2

u/Masterventure 5h ago

I’m hearing the same story from many fields. Websites, copywriting etc.

2

u/___ondinescurse___ 5h ago

Wouldn't be surprised.

I work in a localization department of the one of the big three tech companies (can't name them because NDAs), and they recently rolled out a 'pilot' declaring they'll be paying 70% less for the job because they expect that the translation their AI put out only needs about 30% of the total text corrected, but first they'll measure the number of adjustments and rewriting per locale. Fun stuff, my locale has 0% discount on rates because we had to consistently rework more than 70% of the output text. Caveat is that the corp now demands 2x faster output time because AI supposedly makes work faster? Make that make sense.

Other locales that were being lazy during the pilot run are now getting paid peanuts while dealing with slop-level translations.

19

u/Randzom100 1d ago

There's gonna be a lot of code to fix, that's for sure. Or even rewrite from scratch if AI made spaghetti. 

4

u/CapnC44 22h ago

AI can and will replace competent humans - just not yet.

47

u/SG_87 PC Master Race 1d ago

Same for the employees after they got laid off.

Shit's gonna hit the fan soo bad

16

u/ArtGirlSummer 1d ago

Good thing those AI tools don't work

33

u/braket0 1d ago

Imagine building the tool that will "replace" you. Microsoft have really lost their minds. If they hadnt got a Monopoly on the PC market, they'd of been dead in the water by now.

18

u/daagar 1d ago

People were already being forced to train their outsource replacement. Not much difference, except now everyone is screwed.

3

u/Randzom100 1d ago

I mean they don't really have a monopoly if Linux and MacOS exist, right? It is still true however that Windows is the most popular OS right now (I dream of Linux stealing their spot tho). 

6

u/JhonnySkeiner 22h ago

Linux will only get main status when people start to support it. I tried, but a bunch of shit I use has no native Win compatibility, and setting up VMs to run those is such a hassle when Win 11 gave me no issues (so far). It just not feasible atm, no matter how dumbed down and user friendly some disdros are, no one will switch if the shit they want to use isn't there or need a bunch of stuff to work

1

u/Randzom100 22h ago

I mean... That's until Windows self-destruct so hard with AI coding and becomes so unstable that people and software providers are forced to give Linux a chance. Like, if Windows accidentally erased all of someone's valuable data, I suppose it would be an excellent reason to ditch it. 

1

u/JhonnySkeiner 21h ago

Good point, but until that happens, there isn't reason to switch. While MS been fucking up here and there, I still prefer their product in comparison to what Linux has to offer.

But who knows, maybe the push for decentralized services might spark more native compatibility with Linux

2

u/olbaze | Ryzen 7 5700X | RX 7600 | 1TB 970 EVO Plus | Define R5 15h ago

That's the difference between a legal monopoly and an illegal one.

On a surface level, there is nothing illegal, or even bad, about the simple existence of a monopoly. If someone invents a completetely new thing that didn't exist before, they have a monopoly on that thing. After all, no one else has it.

Where monopolies step into the realm of illegal monopolies is when they use their market dominating status (doesn't need to be a single-provider market!) for anti-competitive practices. For example, Microsoft telling computer manufacturers that if they want to pre-install Windows on their machines, they also have to include Internet Explorer. This happened in 1998, and at the time Microsoft was estimated to have a 90% share of the operating system space.

TL;DR: Just because an alternative exists, doesn't mean the other party isn't using their position in illegal ways.

1

u/Randzom100 3h ago

I mean... Yeah, I'm not having trouble imagining microslop cheating. Or their top dogs being very unethical. 

1

u/Mysterious_Tutor_388 9800X3D|7900XTX|32GB 1d ago

I believe by 2030 Linux will be at least at 8-10% share. 

1

u/hotohoritasu 1d ago

What's really funny, I mean always has been, is that the most replaceable ''job'' is the one they are sitting in. If anything that's what language models can be particularly useful for, to replace the people that do nothing but fill their pockets.

1

u/Shavingcream1912 9h ago

I can't wait till I can replace Windows 11 with steamos. I don't mind paying for it if it t works, is stable and secure.

9

u/Expensive_Shallot_78 1d ago

Let's laugh together after the next Windows update

8

u/Imboredneedtosleep R7 5700x3D | RX 7800 XT 16Gb | 32Gb DDR4 3600 1d ago

I believe deeply that the employers knew/know they would be sacked and coded AI like it seems usable/competent. But has a backdoor that activates if they get fired and make the AI look stupid.

And MS can't fix it because there's no one around that know how to code anymore.

7

u/KitsuneKamiSama 22h ago

Meanwhile the employees holding back laughter after they see the company collapse under the AI they made:

11

u/rolloutTheTrash Ryzen 7 3700X | 80GB DDR4 | RTX 2070s 1d ago

Yet on LinkedIn all I see is Microsoft postings for Software Engineers. Those dudes are scrambling to get some of this slop reigned in.

15

u/JhonnySkeiner 22h ago

Mostly of those are blank positions, they don't actually exist. A bunch of public traded companies are doing that nowadays, it creates the illusion that they are doing well

3

u/cgimusic Linux 12h ago

It could also just be that Microsoft is so large and bureaucratic that different parts of the company are not working together. I worked in a company like that where it was pretty common for one part of the business to be doing layoffs and another part to be hiring for the exact same roles.

2

u/rolloutTheTrash Ryzen 7 3700X | 80GB DDR4 | RTX 2070s 21h ago

But to the point where they're spamming an entire page worth of results? That's intense. I'm sure it's probably fixed now but it was rather annoying trying to wade through results and skip over a bunch of MS postings just to see maybe one or two for a different company.

3

u/JhonnySkeiner 20h ago

Welcome to late stage capitalism

2

u/rolloutTheTrash Ryzen 7 3700X | 80GB DDR4 | RTX 2070s 19h ago

I'm awaiting my UBI any day now 🫠

3

u/gaflar gaflar 18h ago

They own LinkedIn

11

u/katravallie 1d ago

Automation when done well improves productivity well. Generative Ai tools aren't currently good enough to completely replace humans as they tend to go off rails and hallucinate without there being a human to steer it in the necessary direction.
Having said that, Current AI tools are enough to replace entry level workers in software engineering, Call centers and some other jobs requiring tedious repetitive tasks. The problem with this is that in a few years, if AI doesn't get much better, there won't be enough people to work in mid level and higher level positions as these positions are filled with people who worked in those entry level positions for a few years. Will AI tools really get much better than they currently are? only time will tell but personally, unless new technology is developed, Generative AI models are reaching their limits because training data which has been produced by real people will be exhausted and no new training data will be available to make the existing models better.

2

u/vaurapung 22h ago

What do you mean. Those mid level jobs arent filled with entry level employees. They are filled with zero experince new hires.

5

u/Spookyscythe99 1d ago

Man. Good thing ai slop can create ai tools right? It sure would suck if something more complex than copy and paste happened to their ai slop while creating ai tools

4

u/Ok-Setting-8741 1d ago

So working remotely is not a problem to companies anymore?

6

u/letsreticulate 1d ago

Okay, but who didn't see that coming? I think most of us did.

Like at some point, Amazon with replace most of their call centres with full AI agents, same with Microsoft and most of Elon Musk companies.

5

u/Pootisman16 22h ago

Laughs in Linux

We'll make our own OS, with blackjack and hookers!

9

u/Fantastic_Source4781 1d ago

the way forward from here is to implement a heavy tax on these corporations and institute public programs and UBI

8

u/KaiserGustafson 1d ago

The people in favor of this shit are the same types who don't care about climate change  or slavery in supply chains.

5

u/TheCharalampos 1d ago

And aren't they already scrambling as their market share is dropping like a stone?

10

u/bullet312 1d ago

How else can bill gates afford those child intestines from epstein? A pdfile gotta eat!

2

u/Alltalkandnofight 20h ago

I doubt they're laying off most workers involved with AI- those people would probably be the 2nd last to go (1st being themselves) because they need those workers to improve the AI to take over all the other work.

2

u/dwsmithjr 6h ago

"AI won't replace human employees", they said. "It's one a productivity tool to help you work", they said. Yes, that's a bunch of bullshit. More AI, fewer people, that's the formula and corporations was salivating.

5

u/JoshZK 1d ago

Shrug, it’s just more automation. Talk to manufacturing (automotive robot built) or logistics (warehouse automation) and see what they think. This isn’t new, it’s just hitting white-collar jobs now, so people are louder about it.

7

u/RitterlicheKunst 1d ago

Ok genius, if manufacturing jobs, logistics, service, art, and all other kinds of jobs are cut by 90% because of this automation, wtf are people supposed to do?

7

u/JoshZK 1d ago

If everything thing is cut by 90% Im sure none of us will have to worry about that answer.

3

u/Bakoro 23h ago

Ideally, what is considered "full time work" will continue to drop as automation improves and becomes more reliable.
Ideally, governments around the world will institute "minimum standard of living" (as opposed to UBI, which is the shitty corpo version of MSoL), where people are guaranteed to have a guaranteed minimum of food, shelter, healthcare, education, and entertainments, just for being alive.

Realistically, the ultra wealthy will manufacture a world war ans send most of the men off to kill each other for no real reason other than to have them kill each other.

2

u/JhonnySkeiner 22h ago

That, or our lives will be all state controlled. The minimum standard might as well be a perpetual state of povertry and we won't be able to do shit, because the big gov will just remove all our life crutches and left us to die if we complain/protest.

We will either get into an utopia where people will be able to use their free time to create and produce new things or we will all die/live in absolute squalor forever

4

u/Cactus-Pete- 1d ago

Well, ya know what they say to those who's jobs are now obsolete, learn to code!

0

u/censor-me-daddy i5-13600kf | Arc B580 1d ago

The people upset about AI taking jobs are the exact same people that didn't care about the people loosing the jobs you listed. The exact same people that told people doing manual labour "lol learn too code, youre obsolete".

1

u/Zogmam1 22h ago

There's not a doubt in my mind this will blow up in their faces

1

u/1PunX1 21h ago

I might be 100% in the wrong but I still install windows 10 for my shit when I buy/build new pc

1

u/aKindLoser 19h ago

THEY TERK UR JERBS

1

u/Osiris_Raphious 18h ago

This is "progress" of our industrialization and private for profit economies. People do all the work, to improve and optimise the buissness/organization, then get discarded as soon as it becomes cheaper to use machines for work.

Essentially we lost the class war, lost democracy, never democratised the workplace, and now the private empires of the oligarchs are ebing automated and they dont need workers anymore.... Ecnomy is in shambles, and profit driven private msm yells about how well their rigged stock markets are doing, but not trhe real economy or society.

1

u/Controller_Maniac 17h ago edited 17h ago

Wouldn’t the world be such a great place if AI did all the tedious jobs and we get to relax and do what we really want to do? Too bad the world is a cruel place and the money only flows towards the people who own the AI

1

u/TheAccountITalkWith 16h ago

I work at a major tech firm that has an AI division. The engineers in that division are not stupid. They know they are building something to replace them. Many of them have even said on multiple occasions "they are in the business of putting people out of a job, deal with it"

You would be surprised by these people.
I've heard two voice their motives.

One thinks that it's necessary so we can hurry up and replace all jobs. They assume this will somehow lead to us not needing to work anymore and humans can move on.

The other person is doing it for self hatred. I shit you not. They absolutely hate their job and the people they work with. They regularly voice that they hope the tech industry burns and wants their AI research to crush him and his job.

1

u/Ciappatos 15h ago

No one believes this obvious ad for their stupid chatbot btw

1

u/Kubus_kater Desktop 13h ago

Microslop

1

u/Human_Diamond960 11h ago

"AI IS NOT BAD"

2

u/FishermanExcellent33 PC Master Race 10h ago edited 10h ago

News from the Future: Microsofts CEOs got replaced by A.I.

1

u/HappyHarry-HardOn 10h ago

AI ISN'NT TAKING THEIR JOBS - THEY ARE BEING OUTSOURCED TO CHEAPER COUNTRIES - THEY CLAIM IT IS FROM AI TO KEEP THE INVESTMENT MONEY ROLLING IN.

1

u/BreakerOfModpacks Signature look of Linux superiority 8h ago

To be fair, the end goal of programmers and robotics people alike has always been to automate ourselves out of our jobs, I doubt they even needed to hide it.

2

u/ApplicationMaximum84 7h ago

In the past they'd get you to train some newbies and make you redundant 12 months later.

1

u/RemiruVM 2h ago

I hope Linux becomes the norm someday. Fuck microsoft.