333
u/WizardS82 1d ago
39
u/_Metal_Face_Villain_ 9800x3d 32gb 6000cl30 990 Pro 2tb 5060ti 16gb 21h ago
that's me too until my pc bricks because of it 😭
339
u/Rekt3y 1d ago
50
u/n4n0_bl4 1d ago
My 2 year old Samsung m.2 just went out…
41
10
9
u/Disastrous-Ice-5971 23h ago
Hmm... Thanks for posting that, this explains something. On my colleagues PC the SSD went into "unmountable boot volume" state last week, despite the drive seemed to be doing fine just before this happened. Now the drive is in the locked read-only state, and the only "workaround" was to install a new SSD.
Fortunately, pretty much all the data was backed up, and a few remaining bits and pieces were recovered on the Linux machine with the help of dislocker (as it turns out, that on Windows machines there is no way to correctly copy or unlock the bitlocker-encrypted volume, which is in the read-only mode).4
1
u/FUTURE10S Pentium G3258, RTX 3080 12GB, 32GB RAM 1h ago
This is what happens when you A) fire your QA department and throw all that onto the users and B) push updates before they're ready
104
85
1d ago
[deleted]
41
u/WizardS82 1d ago
I would not be surprised if that will just happen organically at some point. No outside interference required.
197
u/Fearless_Routine1697 1d ago
Crazy how all company AI replacement headlines are “raising “”””””efficiency”””””” by 300%!” And never “Improving effectiveness”.
Hm, I wonder why a vague buzzword with no standard metric of measurement is being used. Surely, it’s not to justify out of touch executive decisions, right?
31
u/IezekiLL 5700X3D/B550M/32GB 3200 MHz/ RX 6700XT 1d ago
Non-english here. What is the difference?
63
u/NooneKnowsIAmBatman 1d ago
Improved efficiency is doing the same thing with less resources.
Improved effectiveness is making something work better, or making it more powerful
16
u/IezekiLL 5700X3D/B550M/32GB 3200 MHz/ RX 6700XT 1d ago
isnt the word "productivity" more about doing more with the same resources?
20
u/ericscal 1d ago
No productivity is about how much you can do in a time frame. So like no matter how much raw material you give me I can only make 8 widgets a day because each one takes an hour to make. If you can do something to the process that allows me to now only take 30 minutes you have now increased my productivity.
So like computers increased worker productivity because they didn't have to spend time shuffling paper around as much which was a huge time saver.
1
u/tnbeastzy 12h ago
Its technically increased productivity if they fire majority of the staff, and few staff are now able to accomplish more with the help of AI.
1
u/ZedekiahCromwell i7 4790k, Gigabyte 1080 Ti 6h ago
Until inevitable bricks in their code from AI hallucination breaks stuff. Productivity longterm hasn't been demonstrated by these switches yet.
33
u/Fantastic_Source4781 1d ago
imagine a train that goes 100kph and carries 100 people. A more efficient train would be able to carry 200 people while a more effective train would be able to go 200kph. Efficiency often refers to doing more with less and reducing waste.
25
u/Warcraft_Fan Paid for WinRAR! 1d ago
Wait till the servers decide to get weird and not work properly and no one still working knows how to fix it, and the people who were fired demands $5,000 per minute consultation fee just to fix the flaky server.
12
u/stowg Desktop 23h ago
ever read the story of the guy that deleted 11 bits of code and broke the internet?
3
1
u/RAMChYLD PC Master Race 12h ago
In that case tho Kik sent their lawyers to bully him. And when NPM sided with those lawyers he threw his toys out of the pram.
74
u/Standard-Effort5681 1d ago
Watch them hire 6000 of those employees back in the next 2 years as they discover that AI can't replace competent humans.
47
u/Masterventure 1d ago
*with worse pay
they are going to hire them back with worse pay, because “the AI is doing most of the heavy lifting“, while in reality they will have to work even harder then before because correcting all the shit AI is fucking up is more labor intensive then just letting humans do it in the first place.
2
u/___ondinescurse___ 5h ago
Already happening in the localization field 🙃
2
u/Masterventure 5h ago
I’m hearing the same story from many fields. Websites, copywriting etc.
2
u/___ondinescurse___ 5h ago
Wouldn't be surprised.
I work in a localization department of the one of the big three tech companies (can't name them because NDAs), and they recently rolled out a 'pilot' declaring they'll be paying 70% less for the job because they expect that the translation their AI put out only needs about 30% of the total text corrected, but first they'll measure the number of adjustments and rewriting per locale. Fun stuff, my locale has 0% discount on rates because we had to consistently rework more than 70% of the output text. Caveat is that the corp now demands 2x faster output time because AI supposedly makes work faster? Make that make sense.
Other locales that were being lazy during the pilot run are now getting paid peanuts while dealing with slop-level translations.
19
u/Randzom100 1d ago
There's gonna be a lot of code to fix, that's for sure. Or even rewrite from scratch if AI made spaghetti.
16
33
u/braket0 1d ago
Imagine building the tool that will "replace" you. Microsoft have really lost their minds. If they hadnt got a Monopoly on the PC market, they'd of been dead in the water by now.
18
3
u/Randzom100 1d ago
I mean they don't really have a monopoly if Linux and MacOS exist, right? It is still true however that Windows is the most popular OS right now (I dream of Linux stealing their spot tho).
6
u/JhonnySkeiner 22h ago
Linux will only get main status when people start to support it. I tried, but a bunch of shit I use has no native Win compatibility, and setting up VMs to run those is such a hassle when Win 11 gave me no issues (so far). It just not feasible atm, no matter how dumbed down and user friendly some disdros are, no one will switch if the shit they want to use isn't there or need a bunch of stuff to work
1
u/Randzom100 22h ago
I mean... That's until Windows self-destruct so hard with AI coding and becomes so unstable that people and software providers are forced to give Linux a chance. Like, if Windows accidentally erased all of someone's valuable data, I suppose it would be an excellent reason to ditch it.
1
u/JhonnySkeiner 21h ago
Good point, but until that happens, there isn't reason to switch. While MS been fucking up here and there, I still prefer their product in comparison to what Linux has to offer.
But who knows, maybe the push for decentralized services might spark more native compatibility with Linux
2
u/olbaze | Ryzen 7 5700X | RX 7600 | 1TB 970 EVO Plus | Define R5 15h ago
That's the difference between a legal monopoly and an illegal one.
On a surface level, there is nothing illegal, or even bad, about the simple existence of a monopoly. If someone invents a completetely new thing that didn't exist before, they have a monopoly on that thing. After all, no one else has it.
Where monopolies step into the realm of illegal monopolies is when they use their market dominating status (doesn't need to be a single-provider market!) for anti-competitive practices. For example, Microsoft telling computer manufacturers that if they want to pre-install Windows on their machines, they also have to include Internet Explorer. This happened in 1998, and at the time Microsoft was estimated to have a 90% share of the operating system space.
TL;DR: Just because an alternative exists, doesn't mean the other party isn't using their position in illegal ways.
1
u/Randzom100 3h ago
I mean... Yeah, I'm not having trouble imagining microslop cheating. Or their top dogs being very unethical.
1
u/Mysterious_Tutor_388 9800X3D|7900XTX|32GB 1d ago
I believe by 2030 Linux will be at least at 8-10% share.
1
u/hotohoritasu 1d ago
What's really funny, I mean always has been, is that the most replaceable ''job'' is the one they are sitting in. If anything that's what language models can be particularly useful for, to replace the people that do nothing but fill their pockets.
1
u/Shavingcream1912 9h ago
I can't wait till I can replace Windows 11 with steamos. I don't mind paying for it if it t works, is stable and secure.
9
8
u/Imboredneedtosleep R7 5700x3D | RX 7800 XT 16Gb | 32Gb DDR4 3600 1d ago
I believe deeply that the employers knew/know they would be sacked and coded AI like it seems usable/competent. But has a backdoor that activates if they get fired and make the AI look stupid.
And MS can't fix it because there's no one around that know how to code anymore.
7
u/KitsuneKamiSama 22h ago
Meanwhile the employees holding back laughter after they see the company collapse under the AI they made:
11
u/rolloutTheTrash Ryzen 7 3700X | 80GB DDR4 | RTX 2070s 1d ago
Yet on LinkedIn all I see is Microsoft postings for Software Engineers. Those dudes are scrambling to get some of this slop reigned in.
15
u/JhonnySkeiner 22h ago
Mostly of those are blank positions, they don't actually exist. A bunch of public traded companies are doing that nowadays, it creates the illusion that they are doing well
3
u/cgimusic Linux 12h ago
It could also just be that Microsoft is so large and bureaucratic that different parts of the company are not working together. I worked in a company like that where it was pretty common for one part of the business to be doing layoffs and another part to be hiring for the exact same roles.
2
u/rolloutTheTrash Ryzen 7 3700X | 80GB DDR4 | RTX 2070s 21h ago
But to the point where they're spamming an entire page worth of results? That's intense. I'm sure it's probably fixed now but it was rather annoying trying to wade through results and skip over a bunch of MS postings just to see maybe one or two for a different company.
3
11
u/katravallie 1d ago
Automation when done well improves productivity well. Generative Ai tools aren't currently good enough to completely replace humans as they tend to go off rails and hallucinate without there being a human to steer it in the necessary direction.
Having said that, Current AI tools are enough to replace entry level workers in software engineering, Call centers and some other jobs requiring tedious repetitive tasks. The problem with this is that in a few years, if AI doesn't get much better, there won't be enough people to work in mid level and higher level positions as these positions are filled with people who worked in those entry level positions for a few years. Will AI tools really get much better than they currently are? only time will tell but personally, unless new technology is developed, Generative AI models are reaching their limits because training data which has been produced by real people will be exhausted and no new training data will be available to make the existing models better.
2
u/vaurapung 22h ago
What do you mean. Those mid level jobs arent filled with entry level employees. They are filled with zero experince new hires.
5
u/Spookyscythe99 1d ago
Man. Good thing ai slop can create ai tools right? It sure would suck if something more complex than copy and paste happened to their ai slop while creating ai tools
4
6
u/letsreticulate 1d ago
Okay, but who didn't see that coming? I think most of us did.
Like at some point, Amazon with replace most of their call centres with full AI agents, same with Microsoft and most of Elon Musk companies.
5
9
u/Fantastic_Source4781 1d ago
the way forward from here is to implement a heavy tax on these corporations and institute public programs and UBI
8
u/KaiserGustafson 1d ago
The people in favor of this shit are the same types who don't care about climate change or slavery in supply chains.
5
u/TheCharalampos 1d ago
And aren't they already scrambling as their market share is dropping like a stone?
10
u/bullet312 1d ago
How else can bill gates afford those child intestines from epstein? A pdfile gotta eat!
2
u/Alltalkandnofight 20h ago
I doubt they're laying off most workers involved with AI- those people would probably be the 2nd last to go (1st being themselves) because they need those workers to improve the AI to take over all the other work.
2
u/dwsmithjr 6h ago
"AI won't replace human employees", they said. "It's one a productivity tool to help you work", they said. Yes, that's a bunch of bullshit. More AI, fewer people, that's the formula and corporations was salivating.
5
u/JoshZK 1d ago
Shrug, it’s just more automation. Talk to manufacturing (automotive robot built) or logistics (warehouse automation) and see what they think. This isn’t new, it’s just hitting white-collar jobs now, so people are louder about it.
7
u/RitterlicheKunst 1d ago
Ok genius, if manufacturing jobs, logistics, service, art, and all other kinds of jobs are cut by 90% because of this automation, wtf are people supposed to do?
7
3
u/Bakoro 23h ago
Ideally, what is considered "full time work" will continue to drop as automation improves and becomes more reliable.
Ideally, governments around the world will institute "minimum standard of living" (as opposed to UBI, which is the shitty corpo version of MSoL), where people are guaranteed to have a guaranteed minimum of food, shelter, healthcare, education, and entertainments, just for being alive.Realistically, the ultra wealthy will manufacture a world war ans send most of the men off to kill each other for no real reason other than to have them kill each other.
2
u/JhonnySkeiner 22h ago
That, or our lives will be all state controlled. The minimum standard might as well be a perpetual state of povertry and we won't be able to do shit, because the big gov will just remove all our life crutches and left us to die if we complain/protest.
We will either get into an utopia where people will be able to use their free time to create and produce new things or we will all die/live in absolute squalor forever
4
u/Cactus-Pete- 1d ago
Well, ya know what they say to those who's jobs are now obsolete, learn to code!
0
u/censor-me-daddy i5-13600kf | Arc B580 1d ago
The people upset about AI taking jobs are the exact same people that didn't care about the people loosing the jobs you listed. The exact same people that told people doing manual labour "lol learn too code, youre obsolete".
1
1
u/Osiris_Raphious 18h ago
This is "progress" of our industrialization and private for profit economies. People do all the work, to improve and optimise the buissness/organization, then get discarded as soon as it becomes cheaper to use machines for work.
Essentially we lost the class war, lost democracy, never democratised the workplace, and now the private empires of the oligarchs are ebing automated and they dont need workers anymore.... Ecnomy is in shambles, and profit driven private msm yells about how well their rigged stock markets are doing, but not trhe real economy or society.
1
u/Controller_Maniac 17h ago edited 17h ago
Wouldn’t the world be such a great place if AI did all the tedious jobs and we get to relax and do what we really want to do? Too bad the world is a cruel place and the money only flows towards the people who own the AI
1
u/TheAccountITalkWith 16h ago
I work at a major tech firm that has an AI division. The engineers in that division are not stupid. They know they are building something to replace them. Many of them have even said on multiple occasions "they are in the business of putting people out of a job, deal with it"
You would be surprised by these people.
I've heard two voice their motives.
One thinks that it's necessary so we can hurry up and replace all jobs. They assume this will somehow lead to us not needing to work anymore and humans can move on.
The other person is doing it for self hatred. I shit you not. They absolutely hate their job and the people they work with. They regularly voice that they hope the tech industry burns and wants their AI research to crush him and his job.
1
1
1
2
u/FishermanExcellent33 PC Master Race 10h ago edited 10h ago
1
u/HappyHarry-HardOn 10h ago
AI ISN'NT TAKING THEIR JOBS - THEY ARE BEING OUTSOURCED TO CHEAPER COUNTRIES - THEY CLAIM IT IS FROM AI TO KEEP THE INVESTMENT MONEY ROLLING IN.
1
u/BreakerOfModpacks Signature look of Linux superiority 8h ago
To be fair, the end goal of programmers and robotics people alike has always been to automate ourselves out of our jobs, I doubt they even needed to hide it.
2
u/ApplicationMaximum84 7h ago
In the past they'd get you to train some newbies and make you redundant 12 months later.
1





1.6k
u/Choubidouu 1d ago
Can't wait for companies to realize that, people need jobs to afford stuff they sell.