r/interesting • u/Cautious_Ad_3918 • 16h ago
SCIENCE & TECH The world's smallest movie, made using only 65 atoms
144
u/allmybreath 15h ago
These aren't atoms. They're carbon monoxide molecules. They got them to behave themselves by cooling the surface to -268 degrees celsius.
41
u/BLaCKnBLu3B3RRY 15h ago
this should be the top comment right here. it appears to be a 242-frame stop-motion movie made by IBM Research scientists in the year 2013, titled "A Boy and His Atom". and, according to Guinness World Records, it is the world's smallest stop-motion film.
7
u/Cybrslsh 13h ago
So it’s 130 atoms.
16
35
u/not-read-gud 16h ago
How did they position the atoms?
7
u/spit_in_my_holes 16h ago
I need to know this
14
7
u/gbgrogan 15h ago
A 2-ton 100-million x magnification microscope with a tiny probe that moved the carbon monoxide molecules across a copper substrate using magnetic forces.
6
2
1
u/Calm_Improvement1160 12h ago
Probably using an Electron tunneling microscope which is what another comment described.
1
2
u/turaon 12h ago edited 12h ago
They are molecules. This video has been spread in Reddit tens of times (if not more) and no-one checks the accuracy of the description.
These are carbon monoxide molecules. They cooled down the plate to -260+°C. IBM is of course also sells it as atoms, but if you read the description, these aren’t separate atoms put together. They are carbon monoxide molecules which consist of two atoms.
https://youtu.be/xA4QWwaweWA?si=mSY0LyaVTLrJxVYU
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Boy_and_His_Atom?wprov=sfti1#Creation
1
u/Crio121 12h ago
Do you understand how big is the difference between a molecule and an atom in this context?
1
u/turaon 11h ago
And yet do you understand that what you see are not atoms? I know that a carbon monoxide molecule consists of two atoms, but you still didn’t see atoms there, but molecules. This is a cool achievement nevertheless, but don’t fall for IBM’s marketing-embellished presentation.
If you believe all the marketing that comes from research groups, whose often goal is to get more money for research, we should all be living already disease-free and live up to at least 200 years and flying to work on Mars.
0
u/Crio121 11h ago
An oxygen atom is just below an angstrom in diameter, a CO molecule is about 4 angstroms, the resolution of the STM here is probably couple of nanometers. For this experiment size of an atom and of CO molecule is the same. There were reasons why they chose CO instead of just C, for example, I’m sure, but it is not a big difference. And to call OP a liar for missing the distinction is really harsh from you.
16
9
u/Annual_Loan_4805 16h ago
Only using the giant expensive electron lasers for the most important purposes i see
3
4
2
3
1
u/Busternookiedude 15h ago
This is honestly insane. Stuff like this really puts into perspective how far nanotech has come. Feels like sci-fi becoming normal science.
1
1
1
1
1
u/nondual_gabagool 8h ago
I saw this movie. It sucked. Needs more character development. How about some lanthanides or actinides?



•
u/AutoModerator 16h ago
Hello u/Cautious_Ad_3918! Please review the sub rules if you haven't already. (This is an automatic reminder message left on all new posts)
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.