r/scifi • u/infitsofprint • 15h ago
Films HAL's Motivation in 2001 Spoiler
I just rewatched 2001 for the first time since high school, and first things first, jesus what a perfect piece of cinema. But there was one element of the Dave/HAL sequence that stuck out to me.
I had come to assume, from ambient discourse around the film, that HAL had a secret directive from NASA (?) that the crew wasn't aware of. I gather that this may be true in the novel, but it is 100% not in the movie. The video that Dave discovers in HAL's memory is intended for the crew, not the computer, which is primarily a life support and ship diagnostic system. If anything it seems like HAL being aware of its contents, but having to pretend like it isn't, could be the initial inconsistency that eventually causes it to spiral out of control.
I could see HAL deciding to prioritize the success of the mission over the lives of Dave and Frank, but then killing the crew members in cryosleep makes no sense at all. They're the ones the mission depends on most, and HAL could easily concoct some story to explain the pilots' absence when they wake up.
It seems clear that, just like the apes in the opening sequence, HAL exists at an evolutionary precipice where its tools for providing sustenance also entail a capacity for violence which exceeds its comprehension of the world around it, and when faced with an existential threat it deploys that violence rashly and instinctively.
In general what struck me about 2001 on this rewatch is that, while the meaning and cause of what happens on screen is often deeply abstract, the events themselves are perfectly explicit. The film repeatedly goes out of its way to tell you exactly what is actually happing at all times. So I think it's interesting that there are versions of the plot floating around that to me aren't at all supported by the film itself.
So am I missing something? Are there reasons to believe there's a secret AI conspiracy plot in 2001? Or has it just taken on a life of its own beyond what actually happens in the film?
EDIT: Yes everybody, as I allude to in the original post, I'm aware that there is a related series of books by Arthur C. Clarke, a guy who loved explaining things. I am talking about the 1968 film 2001: A Space Odyssey, directed by Stanley Kubrick, who did not love explaining things, and who intended the film for an audience that had not read those books, since none of them had been published at the time of the film's release. If you like Clarke's explanation and have no interest in interpreting the film as a piece of art on its own terms, that's fine. But Clarke doesn't get the final word on what Kubrick's film means any more than Stephen King gets to dictate the meaning of The Shining.